Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40681 - 40690 of 46054 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 40681 - 40690 of 46054 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
State v. Noel Davila
of the test, and a reviewing court need not address both prongs if the defendant fails to make a sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5699 - 2017-09-19
of the test, and a reviewing court need not address both prongs if the defendant fails to make a sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5699 - 2017-09-19
The Wisconsin Conference Board of Trustees of the United Methodist Church, Inc. v. Ronald Culver
subject matter jurisdiction argument. The UMC appeals. Discussion 1. Test for Appellate Review ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15625 - 2005-03-31
subject matter jurisdiction argument. The UMC appeals. Discussion 1. Test for Appellate Review ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15625 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
failure to test credibility in some additional way. See State v. Tkacz, 2002 WI App 281, ¶¶22-25, 258
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231334 - 2019-01-02
failure to test credibility in some additional way. See State v. Tkacz, 2002 WI App 281, ¶¶22-25, 258
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231334 - 2019-01-02
[PDF]
State v. Antonio Mays
. Lettice, 221 Wis. 2d 69, 80, 585 N.W.2d 171 (Ct. App. 1998). Under the manifest necessity test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19402 - 2017-09-21
. Lettice, 221 Wis. 2d 69, 80, 585 N.W.2d 171 (Ct. App. 1998). Under the manifest necessity test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19402 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
test, and conclude that trial counsel’s failure to object to the portion of the statement regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77359 - 2012-01-31
test, and conclude that trial counsel’s failure to object to the portion of the statement regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77359 - 2012-01-31
COURT OF APPEALS
novo. Id. We need not address both prongs of the test if the defendant fails to make a sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94724 - 2013-04-02
novo. Id. We need not address both prongs of the test if the defendant fails to make a sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94724 - 2013-04-02
COURT OF APPEALS
. The defendant must satisfy both components of the Strickland test and failure to make a sufficient showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58303 - 2010-12-27
. The defendant must satisfy both components of the Strickland test and failure to make a sufficient showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58303 - 2010-12-27
State v. Diane M. Mikic
463, 468 (Ct. App. 1994). The test is whether the resulting prejudice of relevant evidence is fair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12297 - 2005-03-31
463, 468 (Ct. App. 1994). The test is whether the resulting prejudice of relevant evidence is fair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12297 - 2005-03-31
2009 WI APP 66
review an officer’s decision to perform a protective search with an objective test: “[W]hether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36295 - 2009-05-26
review an officer’s decision to perform a protective search with an objective test: “[W]hether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36295 - 2009-05-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). If a defendant fails to make a sufficient showing on one prong of the Strickland test, we need not address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=842758 - 2024-08-27
). If a defendant fails to make a sufficient showing on one prong of the Strickland test, we need not address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=842758 - 2024-08-27