Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40691 - 40700 of 63676 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 40691 - 40700 of 63676 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
(1)(a), second offense, and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Mauermann
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99893 - 2013-07-24
(1)(a), second offense, and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Mauermann
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99893 - 2013-07-24
State v. Nathan T. Moore
: stephen a. simanek, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J.[1] Following the denial of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7447 - 2005-03-31
: stephen a. simanek, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J.[1] Following the denial of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7447 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
court denying their motion for a new trial. The appellants brought negligence and strict liability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76801 - 2012-01-18
court denying their motion for a new trial. The appellants brought negligence and strict liability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76801 - 2012-01-18
[PDF]
State v. David W. Suchocki
of marijuana and an order denying his motion to strike a presentence report prepared by an agent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10963 - 2017-09-19
of marijuana and an order denying his motion to strike a presentence report prepared by an agent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10963 - 2017-09-19
State v. Kenneth W. Pickens
. On the day of a scheduled motion hearing in the case, Pickens' first trial counsel visited him at the jail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11033 - 2005-03-31
. On the day of a scheduled motion hearing in the case, Pickens' first trial counsel visited him at the jail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11033 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to summary judgment in early 2012. The trial court denied motions for summary judgment that were filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136997 - 2015-03-09
to summary judgment in early 2012. The trial court denied motions for summary judgment that were filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136997 - 2015-03-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
registration. She also appeals the order denying her postconviction motion that challenged the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248083 - 2019-10-09
registration. She also appeals the order denying her postconviction motion that challenged the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248083 - 2019-10-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
N.W.2d 758. Postconviction/appellate counsel subsequently filed a postconviction motion pursuant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194500 - 2017-09-21
N.W.2d 758. Postconviction/appellate counsel subsequently filed a postconviction motion pursuant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194500 - 2017-09-21
2009 WI APP 181
the buyers and the sellers signed the offer. The circuit court granted the buyers’ motion for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43921 - 2011-02-07
the buyers and the sellers signed the offer. The circuit court granted the buyers’ motion for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43921 - 2011-02-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals from the order denying his postconviction motion for relief. Upon review, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955428 - 2025-05-13
appeals from the order denying his postconviction motion for relief. Upon review, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955428 - 2025-05-13