Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4071 - 4080 of 97494 for court system search.

COURT OF APPEALS
-videotapes on the basis that the search warrant was invalid as to those items. The court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49247 - 2010-04-27

COURT OF APPEALS
, this court upheld the search of a vehicle where the warrant identified the wrong vehicle, but the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36547 - 2009-05-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 14, 2020 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257735 - 2020-04-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 29, 2020 Sheila T. Reiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291437 - 2020-09-29

COURT OF APPEALS
, and ultimately found that Brown’s consent to the search was voluntary. Brown challenges the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47247 - 2010-02-22

COURT OF APPEALS
was appropriate. ¶6 Regarding the search of Schmidt’s shoes, the circuit court made the following findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87110 - 2012-09-17

COURT OF APPEALS
on the circuit court’s finding that McNeill agreed to be searched right after Schott asked him whether he had any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34701 - 2008-11-24

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV ARROWHEAD SYSTEMS, INC. AND THOMAS J. YOUNG
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=296528 - 2020-10-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 15, 2022 Sheila T. Reiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=483663 - 2022-02-15

COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 15, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75243 - 2011-12-14