Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4071 - 4080 of 29751 for des.
Search results 4071 - 4080 of 29751 for des.
State v. Steven E. Isbell
, Stats., is a question of law which we review de novo. See Steinberg v. Jensen, ___ Wis.2d ___, ___, 534
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8185 - 2005-03-31
, Stats., is a question of law which we review de novo. See Steinberg v. Jensen, ___ Wis.2d ___, ___, 534
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8185 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
a defendant’s postconviction motion is procedurally barred is a question of law which we review de novo. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125302 - 2014-10-28
a defendant’s postconviction motion is procedurally barred is a question of law which we review de novo. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125302 - 2014-10-28
State v. Thomas H. Richmond
a sentence presents a new factor is a question of law that appellate courts review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8816 - 2005-03-31
a sentence presents a new factor is a question of law that appellate courts review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8816 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael M. Meininger
of whether an investigatory stop was legally justified presents a question of law that we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10932 - 2005-03-31
of whether an investigatory stop was legally justified presents a question of law that we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10932 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
a question of law we review de novo). There is no arguable merit to challenging the sufficiency
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95287 - 2013-04-16
a question of law we review de novo). There is no arguable merit to challenging the sufficiency
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95287 - 2013-04-16
[PDF]
State v. Scott J. Frey
that No. 01-2995-CR 3 we review de novo. State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d 446, 448
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4571 - 2017-09-19
that No. 01-2995-CR 3 we review de novo. State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d 446, 448
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4571 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and application of a statute to a set of facts presents a question of law that we review de novo. Acuity v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367834 - 2021-05-19
and application of a statute to a set of facts presents a question of law that we review de novo. Acuity v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367834 - 2021-05-19
[PDF]
Thomas J. Brennan v. Gjerdingen Farms, Inc.
, and that they agree that the uncontested facts present a question of law that may appropriately be decided de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3238 - 2017-09-19
, and that they agree that the uncontested facts present a question of law that may appropriately be decided de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3238 - 2017-09-19
State v. Andrew P. Thompson
, 556 N.W.2d 681 (1996). This court reviews de novo whether the circuit court’s findings of historical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25232 - 2006-05-22
, 556 N.W.2d 681 (1996). This court reviews de novo whether the circuit court’s findings of historical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25232 - 2006-05-22
[PDF]
State v. Marvin L. Anderson
presents a question of law that we decide de novo. State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63, 65
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10560 - 2017-09-20
presents a question of law that we decide de novo. State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63, 65
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10560 - 2017-09-20