Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4071 - 4080 of 57247 for id.
Search results 4071 - 4080 of 57247 for id.
State v. Ronald Frank
erroneous. Id. However, the ultimate determination whether the attorney’s performance falls below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17640 - 2005-04-11
erroneous. Id. However, the ultimate determination whether the attorney’s performance falls below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17640 - 2005-04-11
[PDF]
Manitowoc County Human Services Department v. Nancy K.
a defect is fundamental or technical is a question of law that we review de novo. See id. If the error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13863 - 2014-09-15
a defect is fundamental or technical is a question of law that we review de novo. See id. If the error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13863 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was in fact ineffective. See id. We assess claims of ineffective assistance of counsel by applying the two
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502779 - 2022-04-05
was in fact ineffective. See id. We assess claims of ineffective assistance of counsel by applying the two
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502779 - 2022-04-05
COURT OF APPEALS
of the trial court’s decision. Id. at 385-86. We employ the substantial evidence test, under which we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34830 - 2008-12-09
of the trial court’s decision. Id. at 385-86. We employ the substantial evidence test, under which we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34830 - 2008-12-09
COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant’s understanding of the nature of the crime with which he is charged.” Id., ¶35; see also § 971.08(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34847 - 2008-12-08
the defendant’s understanding of the nature of the crime with which he is charged.” Id., ¶35; see also § 971.08(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34847 - 2008-12-08
Peter A. Liptak v. Theresa A. Liptak
’ credibility. See id. When more than one reasonable inference can be drawn from the credible evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5182 - 2005-03-31
’ credibility. See id. When more than one reasonable inference can be drawn from the credible evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5182 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Derek L. Naff
the defendant’s car, and saw that the defendant’s eyes were bloodshot and glassy. Id. at 357. The officer also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5069 - 2017-09-19
the defendant’s car, and saw that the defendant’s eyes were bloodshot and glassy. Id. at 357. The officer also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5069 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Faith Tasker v. Chieftain Wildrice Company
the discharge is contrary to a fundamental or well-defined public policy. Id. at 449-50. Unless the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5458 - 2017-09-19
the discharge is contrary to a fundamental or well-defined public policy. Id. at 449-50. Unless the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5458 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Manitowoc County Human Services Department v. Nancy K.
a defect is fundamental or technical is a question of law that we review de novo. See id. If the error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13864 - 2014-09-15
a defect is fundamental or technical is a question of law that we review de novo. See id. If the error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13864 - 2014-09-15
State v. Carol M.D.
, they are still multiplicitous if the legislature intended them to be brought as a single count.[3] Id. at 164
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9254 - 2005-03-31
, they are still multiplicitous if the legislature intended them to be brought as a single count.[3] Id. at 164
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9254 - 2005-03-31