Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4071 - 4080 of 58458 for speedy trial.
Search results 4071 - 4080 of 58458 for speedy trial.
State v. Norman J.
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in deciding to terminate his parental rights. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5166 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in deciding to terminate his parental rights. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5166 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the deposition testimony of Omelina’s handwriting expert to be admitted at trial. As a result of its decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=821311 - 2024-07-02
the deposition testimony of Omelina’s handwriting expert to be admitted at trial. As a result of its decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=821311 - 2024-07-02
COURT OF APPEALS
and from an order denying his postconviction motion seeking a new trial. Jones, who is hearing-impaired
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38808 - 2009-08-03
and from an order denying his postconviction motion seeking a new trial. Jones, who is hearing-impaired
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38808 - 2009-08-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial. On appeal, Hayes argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel and should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=222930 - 2018-10-18
trial. On appeal, Hayes argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel and should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=222930 - 2018-10-18
[PDF]
State v. Norman J.
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in deciding to terminate his parental rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5166 - 2017-09-19
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in deciding to terminate his parental rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5166 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
relief. Ihediwa argues that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to dismiss at the close
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87464 - 2012-09-25
relief. Ihediwa argues that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to dismiss at the close
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87464 - 2012-09-25
State v. Eugene F. Olsen
convicting him of several crimes. In his motion and supporting brief filed in the trial court, Olsen claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11112 - 2005-03-31
convicting him of several crimes. In his motion and supporting brief filed in the trial court, Olsen claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11112 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
an order denying his postconviction motion seeking a new trial. Jones, who is hearing-impaired, asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38808 - 2014-09-15
an order denying his postconviction motion seeking a new trial. Jones, who is hearing-impaired, asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38808 - 2014-09-15
Dane County v. Tomas D. C.
. and an order denying his post-verdict motions. He contends that the trial court committed reversible error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13660 - 2005-03-31
. and an order denying his post-verdict motions. He contends that the trial court committed reversible error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13660 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Ihediwa argues that the trial court erroneously denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87464 - 2014-09-15
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Ihediwa argues that the trial court erroneously denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87464 - 2014-09-15