Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40701 - 40710 of 63677 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 40701 - 40710 of 63677 for Motion for joint custody.
Donna M. Roidt v. Thomas D. Roidt
of the circuit court for Marquette County: richard L. rehm, Judge. Affirmed; motion denied. Before Eich
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12540 - 2005-03-31
of the circuit court for Marquette County: richard L. rehm, Judge. Affirmed; motion denied. Before Eich
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12540 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
to represent Hastings in postconviction and appellate proceedings. Attorney Marion filed a motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138499 - 2015-03-24
to represent Hastings in postconviction and appellate proceedings. Attorney Marion filed a motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138499 - 2015-03-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to trial, the State filed a motion in limine seeking to exclude testimony from Burke’s expert witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=377513 - 2021-06-15
to trial, the State filed a motion in limine seeking to exclude testimony from Burke’s expert witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=377513 - 2021-06-15
State v. Douglass Potter
an order denying his postconviction motion. See Wis. Stat. § 940.19(2) (2001–02).[1] Potter claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6662 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his postconviction motion. See Wis. Stat. § 940.19(2) (2001–02).[1] Potter claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6662 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of a firearm by a felon. He argues the circuit court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence seized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89040 - 2012-11-05
of a firearm by a felon. He argues the circuit court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence seized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89040 - 2012-11-05
[PDF]
State v. Phonesavanh Vanmanivong
the assistance of the confidential informants. ¶5 Prior to trial, Vanmanivong filed a motion, pursuant to WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3335 - 2017-09-19
the assistance of the confidential informants. ¶5 Prior to trial, Vanmanivong filed a motion, pursuant to WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3335 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, and an order denying his postconviction motion. Strohman argues his conviction was improper as a matter of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134124 - 2015-02-02
, and an order denying his postconviction motion. Strohman argues his conviction was improper as a matter of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134124 - 2015-02-02
Rock County Human Services Department v. Zenia C.
). The County also filed a motion in limine requesting the court to limit the testimony and evidence presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14615 - 2005-03-31
). The County also filed a motion in limine requesting the court to limit the testimony and evidence presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14615 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion. Strohman argues his conviction was improper as a matter of law because the applicable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134124 - 2017-09-21
postconviction motion. Strohman argues his conviction was improper as a matter of law because the applicable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134124 - 2017-09-21
Rock County Human Services Department v. Zenia C.
). The County also filed a motion in limine requesting the court to limit the testimony and evidence presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14616 - 2005-03-31
). The County also filed a motion in limine requesting the court to limit the testimony and evidence presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14616 - 2005-03-31