Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40731 - 40740 of 61717 for does.

[PDF] WI 55
or serve a copy on the referee. The document does not appear in the record. ¶10 On July 14, 2020
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375874 - 2021-06-09

[PDF] NOTICE
does not make a sufficient showing on one. Strickland, 466 U.S. at 697. ¶9 An attorney’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35383 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Dawn M. Brantmeier
agree with the State that Brantmeier’s brief does not specifically identify which statements she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2733 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a prior firearm prohibition does not necessarily render this collateral consequence inapplicable because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771215 - 2024-03-06

[PDF] State v. Joseph Scaccio III
of the sentence under § 973.19(1)(a). See id. Under § 973.19(1)(a), a defendant does not have to request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16252 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 69
. Of course what that does in the Youngblood line of cases is render the issue of good faith irrelevant here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48764 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
by the Act that are not arbitrary in relation to the legislative goals, and Bhandari’s expert opinion does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82285 - 2012-05-09

COURT OF APPEALS
statute addresses unsafe conditions, not negligent acts. In addition, the law does not require
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40507 - 2009-09-08

[PDF] WI APP 119
omitted). 4 It does not, however, mean “‘effortless.’” Id., ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123254 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Patricia Martin v. Personnel Review Board of the County of Milwaukee
) (fact-finder does not need expert witness to evaluate what photograph depicts). Thus, Martin’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4843 - 2017-09-19