Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40741 - 40750 of 58245 for speedy trial.
Search results 40741 - 40750 of 58245 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Gerald Seay
of the trial court proceedings. However, because Seay entered a valid no contest plea, he has waived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13899 - 2014-09-15
of the trial court proceedings. However, because Seay entered a valid no contest plea, he has waived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13899 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
and knowingly entered. Except as discussed below, we agree with the assessment that the trial court engaged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103520 - 2013-10-29
and knowingly entered. Except as discussed below, we agree with the assessment that the trial court engaged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103520 - 2013-10-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of trial counsel. On appeal, Garcia challenges the circuit court’s refusal to appoint counsel for him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295054 - 2020-10-14
of trial counsel. On appeal, Garcia challenges the circuit court’s refusal to appoint counsel for him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295054 - 2020-10-14
State v. Randy J. Graham
was charged with stealing a purse from Judith Bull. At trial, Bull testified that Graham was a friend of her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15789 - 2005-03-31
was charged with stealing a purse from Judith Bull. At trial, Bull testified that Graham was a friend of her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15789 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the victim’s forensic interview were improperly admitted into evidence at trial. We affirm. ¶2 Ferguson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=631565 - 2023-03-15
of the victim’s forensic interview were improperly admitted into evidence at trial. We affirm. ¶2 Ferguson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=631565 - 2023-03-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Borchardt’s § 100.18 misrepresentation claim because it was not raised in the trial court. See Wirth v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66790 - 2014-09-15
Borchardt’s § 100.18 misrepresentation claim because it was not raised in the trial court. See Wirth v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66790 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as not ripe, and the matter proceeded to a bench trial. ¶5 At trial, the Town presented expert testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215861 - 2018-07-25
as not ripe, and the matter proceeded to a bench trial. ¶5 At trial, the Town presented expert testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215861 - 2018-07-25
[PDF]
Dennis G. Ohlson v. Adams County Board of Adjustment
no evidence to rebut Ohlson. The trial court then remanded the cause to the board for further proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11655 - 2017-09-19
no evidence to rebut Ohlson. The trial court then remanded the cause to the board for further proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11655 - 2017-09-19
State v. Nathaniel S. Sherrod
not guilty and requested a jury trial. The jury found Sherrod guilty of one count of obstructing an officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12731 - 2005-03-31
not guilty and requested a jury trial. The jury found Sherrod guilty of one count of obstructing an officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12731 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his postconviction motion for a new sentencing hearing. Downer contends that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65380 - 2011-06-06
denying his postconviction motion for a new sentencing hearing. Downer contends that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65380 - 2011-06-06