Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40751 - 40760 of 74416 for a ha.

State v. Perry E. Blanks
(1993). As the Supreme Court has stated: “We do not doubt the soundness of [the defendant's] claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8628 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. As discussed above, Neumann has failed to establish that that is the case here. Therefore, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134443 - 2015-02-04

State v. Gerald O. Green
is whether the trial court properly exercised its discretion. When the exercise of discretion has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20769 - 2005-12-27

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
release out of the question. He has not established deficient performance or prejudice. ¶12 Next
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104346 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
, 1998). Wingo has filed numerous postconviction motions since that time; all have been denied. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33698 - 2008-08-11

State v. David G. Huusko
pending trial. See Wis. Stat. § 971.10(4). After the trial has taken place, that remedy is no longer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26441 - 2006-09-11

COURT OF APPEALS
or to reinstate Maddox’s direct appeal rights. We conclude that Maddox has not alleged a sufficient reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29964 - 2010-11-03

State v. Jeffrey J. Jacobsen
information: (1) Has the law enforcement officer not met, or exceeded his or her duty under §§ 343.305(4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7006 - 2005-07-24

COURT OF APPEALS
is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice. Wis. Stat. § 904.03. A trial court has broad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94773 - 2013-04-02

[PDF] CA Blank Order
You are hereby notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=451543 - 2021-11-16