Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40751 - 40760 of 58509 for speedy trial.
Search results 40751 - 40760 of 58509 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
) and 939.05 (1999-2000). Three additional felonies were dismissed and read in at sentencing. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60748 - 2011-03-07
) and 939.05 (1999-2000). Three additional felonies were dismissed and read in at sentencing. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60748 - 2011-03-07
Bank One v. Gregg A. Koch
affirm the order of the trial court. ¶2 Stair and his half-brother, Gregg A. Koch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4294 - 2005-03-31
affirm the order of the trial court. ¶2 Stair and his half-brother, Gregg A. Koch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4294 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dennis Moslavac
warrant. FACTS In the trial court, the parties stipulated to the relevant facts. On March 11, 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14677 - 2017-09-21
warrant. FACTS In the trial court, the parties stipulated to the relevant facts. On March 11, 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14677 - 2017-09-21
Michael T. v. Norma Briggs
of law, which we review de novo, owing no deference to the trial court's decision. State ex rel. Sielen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10789 - 2005-03-31
of law, which we review de novo, owing no deference to the trial court's decision. State ex rel. Sielen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10789 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Stacy contested the petition and requested a jury trial. The circuit court scheduled a final pretrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55242 - 2010-10-06
Stacy contested the petition and requested a jury trial. The circuit court scheduled a final pretrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55242 - 2010-10-06
Donald Murtaugh v. State
judgment in favor of the State of Wisconsin and its co-defendants (the State). The trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6124 - 2005-03-31
judgment in favor of the State of Wisconsin and its co-defendants (the State). The trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6124 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, the trial court viewed the video of the traffic stop and heard testimony by Ash that Stahl “sang
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36315 - 2009-04-29
, the trial court viewed the video of the traffic stop and heard testimony by Ash that Stahl “sang
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36315 - 2009-04-29
COURT OF APPEALS
. Rodriguez demanded a jury trial. The evidence, which Rodriguez does not dispute, showed that he beat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45467 - 2010-01-11
. Rodriguez demanded a jury trial. The evidence, which Rodriguez does not dispute, showed that he beat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45467 - 2010-01-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the opportunity of the trial court to judge the credibility of the witnesses.” WIS. STAT. § 805.17(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236008 - 2019-02-26
to the opportunity of the trial court to judge the credibility of the witnesses.” WIS. STAT. § 805.17(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236008 - 2019-02-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
also appeals the order denying his motion to suppress. Medrow argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82367 - 2014-09-15
also appeals the order denying his motion to suppress. Medrow argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82367 - 2014-09-15