Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40751 - 40760 of 58547 for speedy trial.
Search results 40751 - 40760 of 58547 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a mistrial after the State improperly commented on his pre-Miranda2 silence at trial. We conclude that any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73098 - 2014-09-15
a mistrial after the State improperly commented on his pre-Miranda2 silence at trial. We conclude that any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73098 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
Paulick demanded a jury trial and filed a motion to suppress. The court held a motion hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34029 - 2014-09-15
Paulick demanded a jury trial and filed a motion to suppress. The court held a motion hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34029 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” to Question 5. ¶9 At the conclusion of trial, Breslin moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190914 - 2017-09-21
” to Question 5. ¶9 At the conclusion of trial, Breslin moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190914 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Jessica Smith v. Nikolas H. Markos
(Ct. App. 1998). We review the trial court’s decision de novo. See Millen v. Thomas, 201 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13489 - 2017-09-21
(Ct. App. 1998). We review the trial court’s decision de novo. See Millen v. Thomas, 201 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13489 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
At trial, the defense argued in pertinent part that Tucker acted in complete (perfect) self-defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010725 - 2025-09-18
At trial, the defense argued in pertinent part that Tucker acted in complete (perfect) self-defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010725 - 2025-09-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
also appeals the order denying his motion to suppress. Medrow argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82367 - 2014-09-15
also appeals the order denying his motion to suppress. Medrow argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82367 - 2014-09-15
Donald Murtaugh v. State
judgment in favor of the State of Wisconsin and its co-defendants (the State). The trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6124 - 2005-03-31
judgment in favor of the State of Wisconsin and its co-defendants (the State). The trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6124 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in treatment of his mental health issues and pattern of domestic violence. Following a trial on the motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228136 - 2018-11-20
in treatment of his mental health issues and pattern of domestic violence. Following a trial on the motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228136 - 2018-11-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, stating that “[g]iven that Susan’s conduct violated [§] 948.31, which is a felony, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=428814 - 2021-09-22
, stating that “[g]iven that Susan’s conduct violated [§] 948.31, which is a felony, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=428814 - 2021-09-22
[PDF]
Landshire Fast Foods of Milwaukee, Inc. v. Employers Mutual Casualty Company
. No. 03-0896 4 reverse a decision granting summary judgment if either (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6338 - 2017-09-19
. No. 03-0896 4 reverse a decision granting summary judgment if either (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6338 - 2017-09-19