Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40761 - 40770 of 63428 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 40761 - 40770 of 63428 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
WIS. STAT. § 879.37. In a written order, the circuit court granted her motion and awarded her $1500
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249483 - 2019-11-05
WIS. STAT. § 879.37. In a written order, the circuit court granted her motion and awarded her $1500
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249483 - 2019-11-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
wetland. ¶11 In opposing the State’s motion, Schnepf primarily argued there was a genuine dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228797 - 2018-11-29
wetland. ¶11 In opposing the State’s motion, Schnepf primarily argued there was a genuine dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228797 - 2018-11-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court erred by denying his suppression motion. He also argues the court erred by refusing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177506 - 2017-09-21
the circuit court erred by denying his suppression motion. He also argues the court erred by refusing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177506 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
] and an order denying his motion for post-commitment relief.[2] Because we conclude his claims are entirely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66108 - 2011-06-20
] and an order denying his motion for post-commitment relief.[2] Because we conclude his claims are entirely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66108 - 2011-06-20
COURT OF APPEALS
for reconsideration of the court’s July 2012 decision.[1] The court denied Enbridge’s motion, stating that it would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103118 - 2013-11-11
for reconsideration of the court’s July 2012 decision.[1] The court denied Enbridge’s motion, stating that it would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103118 - 2013-11-11
COURT OF APPEALS
After an evidentiary hearing, the municipal judge denied Engel’s motions and found that the City had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35007 - 2008-12-22
After an evidentiary hearing, the municipal judge denied Engel’s motions and found that the City had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35007 - 2008-12-22
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 6, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
Snyder filed a motion for summary judgment. The court issued a partial summary judgment, essentially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27343 - 2006-12-05
Snyder filed a motion for summary judgment. The court issued a partial summary judgment, essentially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27343 - 2006-12-05
WI App 44 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1878-CR Complete Title...
. § 941.23(2). The only issue on appeal is whether the circuit court properly denied his pre-plea motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109202 - 2014-04-29
. § 941.23(2). The only issue on appeal is whether the circuit court properly denied his pre-plea motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109202 - 2014-04-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
Engel’s motions and found that the City had proved both charges by clear and convincing evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35007 - 2014-09-15
Engel’s motions and found that the City had proved both charges by clear and convincing evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35007 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a pretrial Miranda/Goodchild motion to suppress both of his No. 2017AP1969-CRNM 4 statements
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315445 - 2020-12-22
a pretrial Miranda/Goodchild motion to suppress both of his No. 2017AP1969-CRNM 4 statements
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315445 - 2020-12-22