Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40761 - 40770 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 40761 - 40770 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to trial, the State filed a motion in limine seeking to exclude testimony from Burke’s expert witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=377513 - 2021-06-15
to trial, the State filed a motion in limine seeking to exclude testimony from Burke’s expert witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=377513 - 2021-06-15
State v. David W. Suchocki
and two counts of simple possession of marijuana and an order denying his motion to strike a presentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10963 - 2005-03-31
and two counts of simple possession of marijuana and an order denying his motion to strike a presentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10963 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
when they attached to their supplemental response to Equitable’s motion a 1099-C federal tax form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74750 - 2011-12-06
when they attached to their supplemental response to Equitable’s motion a 1099-C federal tax form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74750 - 2011-12-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
suppression motion because he was unlawfully seized in the curtilage of his home without a warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201515 - 2017-11-07
suppression motion because he was unlawfully seized in the curtilage of his home without a warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201515 - 2017-11-07
State v. Nathan T. Moore
: stephen a. simanek, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J.[1] Following the denial of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7447 - 2005-03-31
: stephen a. simanek, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J.[1] Following the denial of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7447 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Brian Swift
and 939.05 (1999-2000). 1 He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Swift claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6063 - 2017-09-19
and 939.05 (1999-2000). 1 He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Swift claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6063 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
the “circumstances of the event giving rise” to those claims. The court granted Dr. Kopp’s motion with respect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63283 - 2011-04-27
the “circumstances of the event giving rise” to those claims. The court granted Dr. Kopp’s motion with respect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63283 - 2011-04-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
claims that the circuit court was biased against him and should have granted his motion for recusal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291553 - 2020-09-29
claims that the circuit court was biased against him and should have granted his motion for recusal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291553 - 2020-09-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Property and Casualty Insurance Company after denying her motion for a new trial. Turner-Fictum had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=341423 - 2021-03-02
Property and Casualty Insurance Company after denying her motion for a new trial. Turner-Fictum had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=341423 - 2021-03-02
Robin W. Hancock v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
filed a motion to dismiss the complaint against it as Die Mold's insurer on the basis that the action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9451 - 2005-03-31
filed a motion to dismiss the complaint against it as Die Mold's insurer on the basis that the action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9451 - 2005-03-31