Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40761 - 40770 of 68499 for did.
Search results 40761 - 40770 of 68499 for did.
State v. Brad A. Peterson
the trial court did not impose the maximum sentences, it rejected the joint recommendation in favor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11888 - 2005-03-31
the trial court did not impose the maximum sentences, it rejected the joint recommendation in favor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11888 - 2005-03-31
State v. Deborah P. Dodski
also stated that she did not know what had happened, she did not know where she was coming from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3815 - 2005-03-31
also stated that she did not know what had happened, she did not know where she was coming from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3815 - 2005-03-31
2010 WI APP 51
feet of the semi. In addition, it found Tomaszewski did not dim his headlights until he was passing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48247 - 2010-04-25
feet of the semi. In addition, it found Tomaszewski did not dim his headlights until he was passing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48247 - 2010-04-25
CA Blank Order
, and that if Clark used a word that Green indicated he did not understand, Clark would rephrase it and confirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136246 - 2015-03-02
, and that if Clark used a word that Green indicated he did not understand, Clark would rephrase it and confirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136246 - 2015-03-02
COURT OF APPEALS
suspicion did not exist to justify the stop. We disagree and affirm the judgment. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35381 - 2009-02-02
suspicion did not exist to justify the stop. We disagree and affirm the judgment. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35381 - 2009-02-02
Lori Butteris v. Stan Christiansen
conclude that the guests did not establish a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation, that they are not each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13990 - 2005-03-31
conclude that the guests did not establish a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation, that they are not each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13990 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 23
at his request—that the ignition interlock device requirement did not apply to him as a repeat offender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107401 - 2017-09-21
at his request—that the ignition interlock device requirement did not apply to him as a repeat offender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107401 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
both his trial and appellate counsel. We conclude Roalson’s motion did not contain sufficient facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213892 - 2018-06-05
both his trial and appellate counsel. We conclude Roalson’s motion did not contain sufficient facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213892 - 2018-06-05
[PDF]
Ronald L. Ohlmann v. James Roble
and drink. Ohlmann and his fiance, Darlene Jaeger, attended as did Roble. Ohlmann contends that, late
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13981 - 2014-09-15
and drink. Ohlmann and his fiance, Darlene Jaeger, attended as did Roble. Ohlmann contends that, late
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13981 - 2014-09-15
Michael R. Luterbach v. Denise M. Luterbach
exhibited a bias in favor of mothers because its income determination did not require Patulski to work full
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10194 - 2005-03-31
exhibited a bias in favor of mothers because its income determination did not require Patulski to work full
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10194 - 2005-03-31