Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40761 - 40770 of 57346 for id.

[PDF] State v. Michael L. Monsour
. See id. at ¶17. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15980 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. James C. Stigney
blood test was a reasonable search under the Fourth Amendment. See id. at ¶17. By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16161 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
barred unless the petitioner offers a valid reason for not raising them earlier. Id. For Obriecht’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28359 - 2014-09-15

State v. Daniel T. Shea
., motion that could have been raised on direct appeal or in a § 974.02, Stats., motion. Id. at 185, 517
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14251 - 2005-03-31

State v. Rolando Balli
are not at liberty to overrule, modify or withdraw language from a published opinion, id. at 190, we will apply List
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7024 - 2005-03-31

State v. Timothy A. Collins
such as this to trial promptly. Id. at ¶¶18-19. By the Court.—Order affirmed. This opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2246 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
that “[w]hen a defendant moves to vacate a DNA surcharge, the defendant seeks sentence modification.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64239 - 2011-05-16

State v. Ben R. Oldakowski
to the acquittee's continuing dangerousness." Id. at 87-88. Justice O'Connor reasoned that the state cannot confine
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16945 - 2005-03-31

State v. Samuel E. Post
to the acquittee's continuing dangerousness." Id. at 87-88. Justice O'Connor reasoned that the state cannot confine
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16944 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Amicus Brief of Professor Charles Fried in Support of Petitioners
indeed point in another direction. Id. That should come as no surprise, for “the very premise
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0822amicusbrief.pdf - 2023-10-16