Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40761 - 40770 of 46074 for paternity test paper work.

[PDF] NOTICE
court adopted a new test for the admissibility of showup identifications:4 [E]vidence obtained from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27309 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Jacqee R. Anderson
defense. See id. at 311-12 (adopting the two-part test set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15871 - 2017-09-21

The Wisconsin Conference Board of Trustees of the United Methodist Church, Inc. v. Ronald Culver
subject matter jurisdiction argument. The UMC appeals. Discussion 1. Test for Appellate Review ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15625 - 2005-03-31

State v. Calvin R. Mitchell
are weighed in a balancing test to determine whether the probative value of the prior conviction evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4024 - 2005-03-31

WI App 31 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP816 Complete Title o...
. Rather, the test is whether the conviction “was, in fact, for ‘an offense … committed by’ the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108451 - 2014-03-25

[PDF] State v. Tremaine Griffin
a slight effect.” State v. Dyess, 124 Wis.2d 525, 540, 370 N.W.2d 222, 230 (1985). The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12616 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Diane M. Mikic
. Johnson, 184 Wis.2d 324, 340, 516 N.W.2d 463, 468 (Ct. App. 1994). The test is whether the resulting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12297 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
U.S. 668, 687 (1984). ¶8 The test for deficient performance is whether counsel had a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36435 - 2014-09-15

State v. James L. Wright
[Wright] threw the object … and recovered … a white rock-like substance which was later tested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5981 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
novo. Id. We need not address both prongs of the test if the defendant fails to make a sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94724 - 2013-04-02