Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40761 - 40770 of 58480 for speedy trial.
Search results 40761 - 40770 of 58480 for speedy trial.
2008 WI APP 57
was to allow the trial court to effectuate its original sentencing intent. Shue, 825 F.2d at 1113; Mancari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32154 - 2008-04-29
was to allow the trial court to effectuate its original sentencing intent. Shue, 825 F.2d at 1113; Mancari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32154 - 2008-04-29
[PDF]
Warren Viergutz v. Marvin Kraut
contend that the trial court did not have the authority to accept an extension of the redemption period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14626 - 2017-09-21
contend that the trial court did not have the authority to accept an extension of the redemption period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14626 - 2017-09-21
Sheldon Vielie v. Aurora Pharmacy, Inc.
as the trial court and review the matter de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18092 - 2005-05-10
as the trial court and review the matter de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18092 - 2005-05-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a postconviction motion for resentencing. Hohn contends that his No. 2022AP53-CR 2 trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=649139 - 2023-04-27
a postconviction motion for resentencing. Hohn contends that his No. 2022AP53-CR 2 trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=649139 - 2023-04-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
Paulick demanded a jury trial and filed a motion to suppress. The court held a motion hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34029 - 2014-09-15
Paulick demanded a jury trial and filed a motion to suppress. The court held a motion hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34029 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, stating that “[g]iven that Susan’s conduct violated [§] 948.31, which is a felony, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=428814 - 2021-09-22
, stating that “[g]iven that Susan’s conduct violated [§] 948.31, which is a felony, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=428814 - 2021-09-22
Warren Viergutz v. Marvin Kraut
’) agreement with the Krauts to purchase that property. The Viergutzes contend that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14626 - 2005-03-31
’) agreement with the Krauts to purchase that property. The Viergutzes contend that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14626 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
) and 939.05 (1999-2000). Three additional felonies were dismissed and read in at sentencing. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60748 - 2011-03-07
) and 939.05 (1999-2000). Three additional felonies were dismissed and read in at sentencing. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60748 - 2011-03-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and convincing evidence, that the trial court should permit the defendant to withdraw the plea to correct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271992 - 2020-07-23
and convincing evidence, that the trial court should permit the defendant to withdraw the plea to correct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271992 - 2020-07-23
COURT OF APPEALS
by the six-year statute of limitations governing felony offenses, (2) his trial counsel was ineffective, (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97846 - 2013-06-11
by the six-year statute of limitations governing felony offenses, (2) his trial counsel was ineffective, (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97846 - 2013-06-11