Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40761 - 40770 of 58510 for speedy trial.
Search results 40761 - 40770 of 58510 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Robert W. Wodenjak
was convicted as a fourth- time repeat offender pursuant to § 346.65(2)(d). Wodenjak challenges the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3401 - 2017-09-19
was convicted as a fourth- time repeat offender pursuant to § 346.65(2)(d). Wodenjak challenges the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3401 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Harold W. Zastrow
if convicted of violating the conditions of the bond. A jury trial was had and Zastrow was found guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2727 - 2017-09-19
if convicted of violating the conditions of the bond. A jury trial was had and Zastrow was found guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2727 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
by Wis. Stat. § 804.11(1)(b), such that no disputed issues of fact existed for trial and that Loper’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56518 - 2010-11-09
by Wis. Stat. § 804.11(1)(b), such that no disputed issues of fact existed for trial and that Loper’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56518 - 2010-11-09
2008 WI APP 57
was to allow the trial court to effectuate its original sentencing intent. Shue, 825 F.2d at 1113; Mancari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32154 - 2008-04-29
was to allow the trial court to effectuate its original sentencing intent. Shue, 825 F.2d at 1113; Mancari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32154 - 2008-04-29
Certification
Charles Hennings was convicted of felony murder after a second trial, and sentenced to a sixty-year prison
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102552 - 2013-10-02
Charles Hennings was convicted of felony murder after a second trial, and sentenced to a sixty-year prison
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102552 - 2013-10-02
State v. Luis E. Hernandez
). Hernandez contends that the trial court erred in denying a motion to suppress evidence gathered after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3106 - 2005-03-31
). Hernandez contends that the trial court erred in denying a motion to suppress evidence gathered after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3106 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jessica Smith v. Nikolas H. Markos
(Ct. App. 1998). We review the trial court’s decision de novo. See Millen v. Thomas, 201 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13489 - 2017-09-21
(Ct. App. 1998). We review the trial court’s decision de novo. See Millen v. Thomas, 201 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13489 - 2017-09-21
Michael T. v. Norma Briggs
of law, which we review de novo, owing no deference to the trial court's decision. State ex rel. Sielen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10789 - 2005-03-31
of law, which we review de novo, owing no deference to the trial court's decision. State ex rel. Sielen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10789 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI APP 49
expand the ‘public policy’ exception in Wisconsin.” ¶6 The trial court granted Sysco’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28228 - 2007-03-27
expand the ‘public policy’ exception in Wisconsin.” ¶6 The trial court granted Sysco’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28228 - 2007-03-27
COURT OF APPEALS
Stacy contested the petition and requested a jury trial. The circuit court scheduled a final pretrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55242 - 2010-10-06
Stacy contested the petition and requested a jury trial. The circuit court scheduled a final pretrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55242 - 2010-10-06