Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40791 - 40800 of 63907 for records.
Search results 40791 - 40800 of 63907 for records.
COURT OF APPEALS
the criteria of [Wis. Stat.] § 51.20(1)(a)2.c.” We have not found, in the record, any specific indication
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120938 - 2014-09-09
the criteria of [Wis. Stat.] § 51.20(1)(a)2.c.” We have not found, in the record, any specific indication
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120938 - 2014-09-09
State v. Jermaine Jones
. The trial court determined that the record did not support the latter allegation and that it was the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8191 - 2005-03-31
. The trial court determined that the record did not support the latter allegation and that it was the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8191 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in light of the correct standard of review and failed to include citations to the record in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=126112 - 2017-09-21
in light of the correct standard of review and failed to include citations to the record in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=126112 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Demell V. Glenn
: Let the record reflect that at that point I was pointing to the defendant. The Court: So noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2457 - 2017-09-19
: Let the record reflect that at that point I was pointing to the defendant. The Court: So noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2457 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
) (implicit finding of fact sufficient when facts of record support court’s decision). The record supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34365 - 2014-09-15
) (implicit finding of fact sufficient when facts of record support court’s decision). The record supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34365 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
charge. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=559435 - 2022-08-30
charge. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=559435 - 2022-08-30
COURT OF APPEALS
of his sophomore year, and recorded an “F” in a course he had previously failed, a “D” and an “I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42255 - 2009-10-14
of his sophomore year, and recorded an “F” in a course he had previously failed, a “D” and an “I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42255 - 2009-10-14
[PDF]
WI APP 7
by subsequent testing. So far as this record discloses, the officer might have a very poor track record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44952 - 2014-09-15
by subsequent testing. So far as this record discloses, the officer might have a very poor track record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44952 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Beverly G.
placements. ¶8 This court has reviewed the record, particularly the trial court’s analysis of these six
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17898 - 2017-09-21
placements. ¶8 This court has reviewed the record, particularly the trial court’s analysis of these six
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17898 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal. We summarily affirm the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196855 - 2017-09-27
of the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal. We summarily affirm the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196855 - 2017-09-27