Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4081 - 4090 of 17388 for Cost.
Search results 4081 - 4090 of 17388 for Cost.
State v. Leah B. Hensiak
that the minimum fine was $1,800 plus costs. He urged the trial court to impose “whatever fine would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5802 - 2005-03-31
that the minimum fine was $1,800 plus costs. He urged the trial court to impose “whatever fine would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5802 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, and that a signed victim impact statement which she provided regarding the cost of the abatement of Lawhorn’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29135 - 2014-09-15
, and that a signed victim impact statement which she provided regarding the cost of the abatement of Lawhorn’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29135 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Lisa A. Carter
and that portion of the postconviction order upholding it. Carter additionally challenges the “court costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14142 - 2014-09-15
and that portion of the postconviction order upholding it. Carter additionally challenges the “court costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14142 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and awarded costs to the Village. DISCUSSION ¶13 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144403 - 2017-09-21
and awarded costs to the Village. DISCUSSION ¶13 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144403 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 68
in 2327, LLC, to Schafer for $440,000, plus all costs incurred in acquiring the property. The Outline
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29319 - 2014-09-15
in 2327, LLC, to Schafer for $440,000, plus all costs incurred in acquiring the property. The Outline
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29319 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Benedetta Balistrieri v. Joseph P. Balistrieri
judgment denying his request for costs and attorney’s fees based on its determination that Benedetta’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5367 - 2017-09-19
judgment denying his request for costs and attorney’s fees based on its determination that Benedetta’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5367 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Frontsheet
, with conditions. Accordingly, we grant his reinstatement petition. We impose the full costs of this proceeding
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171050 - 2017-09-21
, with conditions. Accordingly, we grant his reinstatement petition. We impose the full costs of this proceeding
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171050 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
be required to pay the costs of this reinstatement proceeding, which were $7,674.57 as of October 10, 2017
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213299 - 2018-05-24
be required to pay the costs of this reinstatement proceeding, which were $7,674.57 as of October 10, 2017
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213299 - 2018-05-24
Frontsheet
further recommended that Attorney Cooper be required to pay the costs of this disciplinary proceeding
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98502 - 2013-06-25
further recommended that Attorney Cooper be required to pay the costs of this disciplinary proceeding
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98502 - 2013-06-25
Frontsheet
education (CLE) credits approved for ethics and pay the costs of this disciplinary proceeding. ¶2 Neither
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33572 - 2008-07-29
education (CLE) credits approved for ethics and pay the costs of this disciplinary proceeding. ¶2 Neither
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33572 - 2008-07-29