Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4081 - 4090 of 63316 for Motion for joint custody.

COURT OF APPEALS
)(a) (2011-12).[1] He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Miller seeks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94773 - 2013-04-02

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. §§ 940.20(1), 947.01 and 939.62(1)(a) (2011-12).1 He also appeals an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94773 - 2014-09-15

Madison Metropolitan School District v. School District Boundary Appeal Board
educational policy. Joint Sch. Dist. No. 2 v. State Appeal Bd., 83 Wis.2d 711, 720, 266 N.W.2d 374, 378-79
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13236 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 110
, which is cartilage in the knee joint.2 The injury was surgically repaired by a meniscectomy performed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66015 - 2014-09-15

WI App 110 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP1849 Complete Title...
joint.[2] The injury was surgically repaired by a meniscectomy performed by Dr. Richard Lemon in 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66015 - 2013-04-23

[PDF] Madison Metropolitan School District v. School District Boundary Appeal Board
and expertise in establishing educational policy. Joint Sch. Dist. No. 2 v. State Appeal Bd., 83 Wis.2d 711
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13236 - 2017-09-21

State v. Nathaniel Wondergem
appeals from the trial court order suppressing Nathaniel Wondergem’s custodial statements and derivative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13739 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Nathaniel Wondergem
custodial statements and derivative physical evidence. The State argues that the court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13739 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
denying his sentence modification motion.1 The issue is whether Owens is entitled to sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28916 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
that part of a postconviction order partially denying his sentence modification motion.[1] The issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28916 - 2007-06-26