Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4081 - 4090 of 7603 for ow.
Search results 4081 - 4090 of 7603 for ow.
Kathy Laska v. Town of Waukesha Zoning Board of Appeals
. We owe no deference to the circuit court's decision to dismiss the petition and the amended petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10972 - 2005-03-31
. We owe no deference to the circuit court's decision to dismiss the petition and the amended petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10972 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
was owed 249 days of sentence credit because he was in custody “[f]ourteen days in March, then all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56614 - 2014-09-15
was owed 249 days of sentence credit because he was in custody “[f]ourteen days in March, then all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56614 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Waukesha County v. Albert A. Tadych
was delivered, mailed; secondly, that taxes were due and owing; and, thirdly, that taxes were unpaid, all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7761 - 2017-09-19
was delivered, mailed; secondly, that taxes were due and owing; and, thirdly, that taxes were unpaid, all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7761 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Howell also claims that government officials breached a duty of care they owed to Howell by ignoring
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984145 - 2025-07-17
. Howell also claims that government officials breached a duty of care they owed to Howell by ignoring
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984145 - 2025-07-17
Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Luz O.
, and this court owes no deference to the trial court’s determination. State v. Grayson, 165 Wis. 2d 557, 563, 478
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7329 - 2005-03-31
, and this court owes no deference to the trial court’s determination. State v. Grayson, 165 Wis. 2d 557, 563, 478
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7329 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
¶15 Central contends, however, that the record is devoid of evidence that Bud’s owes a legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79054 - 2014-09-15
¶15 Central contends, however, that the record is devoid of evidence that Bud’s owes a legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79054 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Robert E. Willow v. City of Menomonie
N.W.2d 175 (Ct. App. 1995), and owing no deference to the trial court’s determination. Waters v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5852 - 2017-09-19
N.W.2d 175 (Ct. App. 1995), and owing no deference to the trial court’s determination. Waters v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5852 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
home had an appraised value of $170,000, he owed $159,000 on the mortgage, and his monthly mortgage
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=954933 - 2025-05-13
home had an appraised value of $170,000, he owed $159,000 on the mortgage, and his monthly mortgage
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=954933 - 2025-05-13
COURT OF APPEALS
the police station with an anonymous tip. The second caller did not want her name used because she owed Long
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131902 - 2014-12-22
the police station with an anonymous tip. The second caller did not want her name used because she owed Long
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131902 - 2014-12-22
[PDF]
New Horizons Supply Cooperative v. George Haack
novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s reasoning. See Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 147 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14208 - 2014-09-15
novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s reasoning. See Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 147 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14208 - 2014-09-15