Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4081 - 4090 of 60463 for quit claim deed.

CA Blank Order
concludes that there would be “no basis for claiming that Mark [E.] was not advised of his procedural rights
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100492 - 2013-08-04

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
makes four claims of error against the circuit court; we address each in turn. I. Consideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79675 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
indicated to you, Mr. Grube, my intention, quite frankly, was to look at sentencing you to prison for two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71143 - 2014-09-15

CA Blank Order
behaviors were quite typical of schizophrenia. Trial counsel was replaced with a successor because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103795 - 2013-10-29

[PDF] State v. Brian A. Patterson
on this basis obviates the need to address Patterson’s ineffective-assistance claim. See Gross v. Hoffman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5216 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
quite sure that you knew what was in the stuff that you were selling…. It’s got to stop. All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219528 - 2018-09-25

COURT OF APPEALS
and denied the petition for discharge. On appeal, Purifoy makes four claims of error against the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79675 - 2012-03-19

COURT OF APPEALS
good indications that he is quite likely to succeed in remaining abstinent and is therefore unlikely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121156 - 2014-09-08

State v. Bernard E. Burgess
recollection of the events. ¶9 Quite simply, the second sentencing hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3279 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Carlos R. Delgado
for the credibility of the victims. He also claims that the State made improper use of the expert’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3587 - 2017-09-19