Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4081 - 4090 of 19278 for transfer by affidavit.
Search results 4081 - 4090 of 19278 for transfer by affidavit.
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court that he was taking steps to transfer the title of the condominium unit into his name
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124805 - 2014-10-27
the circuit court that he was taking steps to transfer the title of the condominium unit into his name
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124805 - 2014-10-27
COURT OF APPEALS
. In 2006, prior to Cletus’s death, Evelyn was allowed to transfer her interest in their marital home to her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69286 - 2011-08-08
. In 2006, prior to Cletus’s death, Evelyn was allowed to transfer her interest in their marital home to her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69286 - 2011-08-08
COURT OF APPEALS
their option to purchase the real estate, and in 2002 Mary transferred her interest to Joseph. In 2005 James
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52080 - 2010-07-14
their option to purchase the real estate, and in 2002 Mary transferred her interest to Joseph. In 2005 James
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52080 - 2010-07-14
Michelle Benzow v. Bernard W. Hall, Jr.
a reasonable jury could infer that Hall and Bierman’s intent was anything other than to transfer ownership
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19748 - 2005-09-26
a reasonable jury could infer that Hall and Bierman’s intent was anything other than to transfer ownership
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19748 - 2005-09-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
their option to purchase the real estate, and in 2002 Mary transferred her interest to Joseph. In 2005 James
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52080 - 2014-09-15
their option to purchase the real estate, and in 2002 Mary transferred her interest to Joseph. In 2005 James
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52080 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
the warrant relied on an affidavit detailing the dog's alert to the presence of drugs, the warrant was invalid
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136547 - 2015-03-04
the warrant relied on an affidavit detailing the dog's alert to the presence of drugs, the warrant was invalid
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136547 - 2015-03-04
[PDF]
Frontsheet
. Accordingly, he argues, because the warrant relied on an affidavit detailing the dog's alert to the presence
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136547 - 2017-09-21
. Accordingly, he argues, because the warrant relied on an affidavit detailing the dog's alert to the presence
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136547 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
recanted his allegations against Arnold. Arnold offered the victim’s November 2011 affidavit alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134640 - 2017-09-21
recanted his allegations against Arnold. Arnold offered the victim’s November 2011 affidavit alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134640 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Alton B. Ison, Jr. v. Lucille V. Nefstead
of the Johnsons’ intent. No(s). 98-2799-FT 4 Nefstead argues that the affidavit of her predecessor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14562 - 2017-09-21
of the Johnsons’ intent. No(s). 98-2799-FT 4 Nefstead argues that the affidavit of her predecessor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14562 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
evidence. The evidence was an affidavit by Johnson, which counsel represented that Smith had obtained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=490523 - 2022-03-03
evidence. The evidence was an affidavit by Johnson, which counsel represented that Smith had obtained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=490523 - 2022-03-03