Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4081 - 4090 of 19287 for transfer by affidavit.
Search results 4081 - 4090 of 19287 for transfer by affidavit.
COURT OF APPEALS
effect of the newly discovered evidence and the affidavit of the recently located witness. Finally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78455 - 2012-02-22
effect of the newly discovered evidence and the affidavit of the recently located witness. Finally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78455 - 2012-02-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32586 - 2014-09-15
with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32586 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, except for the transcript which no longer is available. Ehmke also supplied an affidavit averring, inter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43959 - 2007-03-06
, except for the transcript which no longer is available. Ehmke also supplied an affidavit averring, inter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43959 - 2007-03-06
Frontsheet
immigration consequences. ¶2 In support of his motion, Negrete stated in an affidavit that he "do[es
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84839 - 2012-07-11
immigration consequences. ¶2 In support of his motion, Negrete stated in an affidavit that he "do[es
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84839 - 2012-07-11
[PDF]
WI 92
in an affidavit that he "do[es] not recall" whether the plea-accepting court advised him of the potential
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84839 - 2014-09-15
in an affidavit that he "do[es] not recall" whether the plea-accepting court advised him of the potential
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84839 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
recanted his allegations against Arnold. Arnold offered the victim’s November 2011 affidavit alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134640 - 2017-09-21
recanted his allegations against Arnold. Arnold offered the victim’s November 2011 affidavit alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134640 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Alton B. Ison, Jr. v. Lucille V. Nefstead
of the Johnsons’ intent. No(s). 98-2799-FT 4 Nefstead argues that the affidavit of her predecessor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14562 - 2017-09-21
of the Johnsons’ intent. No(s). 98-2799-FT 4 Nefstead argues that the affidavit of her predecessor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14562 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
. Accordingly, he argues, because the warrant relied on an affidavit detailing the dog's alert to the presence
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136547 - 2017-09-21
. Accordingly, he argues, because the warrant relied on an affidavit detailing the dog's alert to the presence
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136547 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
the warrant relied on an affidavit detailing the dog's alert to the presence of drugs, the warrant was invalid
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136547 - 2015-03-04
the warrant relied on an affidavit detailing the dog's alert to the presence of drugs, the warrant was invalid
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136547 - 2015-03-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
evidence. The evidence was an affidavit by Johnson, which counsel represented that Smith had obtained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=490523 - 2022-03-03
evidence. The evidence was an affidavit by Johnson, which counsel represented that Smith had obtained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=490523 - 2022-03-03

