Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40801 - 40810 of 59253 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 40801 - 40810 of 59253 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
Todd M. Spoehr v. Regina R. Woroniecki
criticized Edington’s conclusions. This unrefuted critique fails to support Woroniecki’s claim that her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6026 - 2017-09-19
criticized Edington’s conclusions. This unrefuted critique fails to support Woroniecki’s claim that her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6026 - 2017-09-19
State v. David G. Alexander
. Alexander moved to suppress the Intoxilyzer results, claiming that Wis. Adm. Code § Trans. 311.04
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11091 - 2005-03-31
. Alexander moved to suppress the Intoxilyzer results, claiming that Wis. Adm. Code § Trans. 311.04
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11091 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for resentencing. Turner claims the circuit court relied upon inaccurate information when determining his sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36574 - 2009-05-26
for resentencing. Turner claims the circuit court relied upon inaccurate information when determining his sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36574 - 2009-05-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
circumstances presented in each individual case and holds that after-the- fact defense claims of “subjective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99820 - 2017-09-21
circumstances presented in each individual case and holds that after-the- fact defense claims of “subjective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99820 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of his five claims against Newell Enterprises, LLC and Allan Newell (collectively, Newell) for alleged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154329 - 2017-09-21
of his five claims against Newell Enterprises, LLC and Allan Newell (collectively, Newell) for alleged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154329 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, Perner’s claims fail because he has not demonstrated that he was prejudiced. See Strickland v. Washington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107730 - 2014-02-05
, Perner’s claims fail because he has not demonstrated that he was prejudiced. See Strickland v. Washington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107730 - 2014-02-05
COURT OF APPEALS
. To establish an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, a defendant must show both that counsel’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28816 - 2007-05-01
. To establish an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, a defendant must show both that counsel’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28816 - 2007-05-01
COURT OF APPEALS
for allocution.[2] He further claimed that the lack of preparation led him “to make a poor impression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65380 - 2011-06-06
for allocution.[2] He further claimed that the lack of preparation led him “to make a poor impression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65380 - 2011-06-06
Ray A. Peterson v. Teresa E. Tucker
assertions that rent payments were made late or not at all. This case, however, involves a landlord’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15113 - 2005-03-31
assertions that rent payments were made late or not at all. This case, however, involves a landlord’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15113 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, and elected not to. The State claimed that it “definitely was interested in keeping this on track
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29615 - 2007-07-09
, and elected not to. The State claimed that it “definitely was interested in keeping this on track
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29615 - 2007-07-09