Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40801 - 40810 of 51932 for legal separation.

State v. Eddie L. Quinn
intoxication is not a legal excuse for a crime, but, when intent is an element of a crime, evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15111 - 2005-03-31

State v. Shannan M. Nipple
interpreted the facts and applied the proper legal standard to them. State v. Rogers, 196 Wis.2d 817, 829
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13829 - 2005-03-31

City of Middleton v. Daniel L. Barrett
. The combination of a pat-down not justified by a legal suspicion and being placed in the squad car constituted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10324 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
did not fundamentally change the legal or factual parameters of the case at all: the charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67302 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
the proper legal standard to reach a reasonable decision. LeMere v. LeMere, 2003 WI 67, ¶13, 262 Wis. 2d 426
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42800 - 2009-10-28

[PDF] State v. Laura K-T.
with accepted legal standards and in accordance with the facts of record.’” Tara P., 252 Wis. 2d 179, ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6407 - 2017-09-19

Jeffrey S. Hacker v. Nancy M. Hacker
, if it provides appropriate and legally sound reasons, to “hold open” a final maintenance decision after declining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19164 - 2005-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
exercises discretion when it considers the facts of record under the proper legal standard and reaches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216711 - 2018-07-31

State v. Larry Howard
is not entitled to relief, the trial court may in the exercise of its legal discretion deny the motion without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14167 - 2005-03-31

Dunn County v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
(Ct. App. 1995). However, we need not defer on legal questions, particularly those of constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25024 - 2006-06-27