Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40801 - 40810 of 58245 for speedy trial.

State v. Jason J. Groff
conclude that the trial court properly imposed a criminal penalty because a demerit point suspension
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13336 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
that there would be no arguable merit to a claim that Ceron Peralta’s trial attorney was constitutionally
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871850 - 2024-11-06

State v. Larry A. Clairmore
for the initial stop or probable cause for the arrest. The trial court rejected Clairmore’s arguments and denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4010 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition of sentence, but not known to the trial judge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170630 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Brian J. Leiteritz
alleged that he had received ineffective assistance of trial counsel during the plea proceedings because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6055 - 2017-09-19

State v. Brian J. Leiteritz
of trial counsel during the plea proceedings because counsel had told him that he would be able to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6055 - 2005-03-31

Conrad L. Aichele and Amanda L. Aichele v. Clark County
the trial court’s determination that the County was immune from suit. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15973 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that his trial counsel was prejudicially ineffective for failing to object to the State’s material breach
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214711 - 2018-06-27

[PDF] Harold L. Johnson v. Don Dahle
not share that immunity because it did not timely plead immunity, and the trial court properly exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13712 - 2014-09-15

State v. Dallas D. Lucas
any rationale justifying such consecutive and lengthy sentences. He explains: The trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7105 - 2005-03-31