Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40811 - 40820 of 68517 for did.

CA Blank Order
variously answered that she did not know, it depended on the job, she would like to “stay where I am
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102111 - 2013-09-24

Nicholas Christman v. Michael Galanton
or was subject to Magnuson’s sexual assaults, that KHDS staff knew of Magnuson’s conduct, that staff did nothing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6105 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
was not completed within ninety days, the court did not lose competency because Wis. Stat. § 54.44(1) does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83344 - 2012-06-04

COURT OF APPEALS
defense counsel’s performance was defective because counsel acknowledged that he did not consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63275 - 2011-05-03

COURT OF APPEALS
Homecare’s business, and the exigency of the circumstances did not allow time for a letter to be sent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121816 - 2014-09-15

Richard Greene v. Allan S. Greene
the complaint as to Nikki-Anne’s claim. The court did not rule on the balance of Allan’s motion and the minutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3708 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶6 Reese’s counsel’s decision not to call the victim to testify did not constitute deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125159 - 2014-10-22

City of Madison v. William J. Sanders
and prejudicial, and the guilty verdict is based on insufficient evidence. We conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9007 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
motion to suppress because the arresting officer did not have reasonable suspicion to make a traffic stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28123 - 2007-02-12

Jefferson County Child Support Agency v. Bryan J. Addie
of the court order on grounds that the court could not have entered the order it did without the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5819 - 2005-03-31