Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40811 - 40820 of 82881 for simple case search.
Search results 40811 - 40820 of 82881 for simple case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneously denied his motion to dismiss the case on double jeopardy grounds. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35622 - 2009-02-23
erroneously denied his motion to dismiss the case on double jeopardy grounds. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35622 - 2009-02-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
factors in light of the facts of this case. See State v. Ziegler, 2006 WI App 49, ¶23, 289 Wis. 2d 594
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220612 - 2018-10-03
factors in light of the facts of this case. See State v. Ziegler, 2006 WI App 49, ¶23, 289 Wis. 2d 594
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220612 - 2018-10-03
[PDF]
State v. Steven T. Miller
to Miller's sentence on revocation in an unrelated case. At the sentencing hearing, defense counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9136 - 2017-09-19
to Miller's sentence on revocation in an unrelated case. At the sentencing hearing, defense counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9136 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 15, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
in another case with nearly identical facts. See Saenz, 2007 WI App 25. Because it is clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28458 - 2007-03-14
in another case with nearly identical facts. See Saenz, 2007 WI App 25. Because it is clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28458 - 2007-03-14
State v. Jeremy J. Ramirez
in [the OWI case], the evidence is not sufficient to support the conviction in this case. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6360 - 2005-03-31
in [the OWI case], the evidence is not sufficient to support the conviction in this case. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6360 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Pluemer
given at a recent preliminary hearing in a different criminal case against Pluemer. From
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2193 - 2017-09-19
given at a recent preliminary hearing in a different criminal case against Pluemer. From
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2193 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
convictions. The mother’s testimony was not critical to the State’s case. She merely explained her role
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101852 - 2017-09-21
convictions. The mother’s testimony was not critical to the State’s case. She merely explained her role
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101852 - 2017-09-21
Walter L. Merten v. Department of Transportation
was already before the court when it dismissed the case. The court again noted the simplicity of arranging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2723 - 2005-03-31
was already before the court when it dismissed the case. The court again noted the simplicity of arranging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2723 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jo Ann Leszcynski
of Transportation, in a different case, City of Superior v. Curran, Douglas County, WI, Case No. 04-TR-2490-92
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18383 - 2017-09-21
of Transportation, in a different case, City of Superior v. Curran, Douglas County, WI, Case No. 04-TR-2490-92
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18383 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
City of Prairie Du Chien v. George J. Eastman
. In that case, the defendant sought to suppress the results of a breath test on grounds that the testing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8576 - 2017-09-19
. In that case, the defendant sought to suppress the results of a breath test on grounds that the testing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8576 - 2017-09-19