Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40811 - 40820 of 58245 for speedy trial.
Search results 40811 - 40820 of 58245 for speedy trial.
County of Jefferson v. James A. Lenz
and driving with a PAC, both as a first offender.[3] At a trial to the court, Lenz moved to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15544 - 2005-03-31
and driving with a PAC, both as a first offender.[3] At a trial to the court, Lenz moved to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15544 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a suppression motion challenging the search warrant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239996 - 2019-04-29
that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a suppression motion challenging the search warrant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239996 - 2019-04-29
[PDF]
State v. Christopher Holmes
op. at 5 (Wis. Ct. App. Apr. 6, 1998). ¶3 Both Holmes and his trial counsel testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15451 - 2017-09-21
op. at 5 (Wis. Ct. App. Apr. 6, 1998). ¶3 Both Holmes and his trial counsel testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15451 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 805.17(2).[1] When there is conflicting testimony, the trial court is the ultimate arbiter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28997 - 2007-05-14
. Stat. § 805.17(2).[1] When there is conflicting testimony, the trial court is the ultimate arbiter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28997 - 2007-05-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of her husband, Roland Krueger. At trial, Sarah Johnson testified that she knew Krueger and Roland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143666 - 2017-09-21
of her husband, Roland Krueger. At trial, Sarah Johnson testified that she knew Krueger and Roland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143666 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
penis into her vagina as she continued to yell, “No!” At trial, F.M.C. repeated her allegations
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182012 - 2017-09-21
penis into her vagina as she continued to yell, “No!” At trial, F.M.C. repeated her allegations
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182012 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
worthless checks to induce Penix to represent Rozum at trial. Rozum answered and counterclaimed, seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=947819 - 2025-04-30
worthless checks to induce Penix to represent Rozum at trial. Rozum answered and counterclaimed, seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=947819 - 2025-04-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
; and (4) trial counsel was ineffective for failing to ask for a concurrent sentence, which was warranted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699511 - 2023-09-06
; and (4) trial counsel was ineffective for failing to ask for a concurrent sentence, which was warranted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699511 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
State v. Thomas C. Smith
will consider the merits and determine whether the trial court properly applied a penalty enhancer to Smith’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4555 - 2017-09-20
will consider the merits and determine whether the trial court properly applied a penalty enhancer to Smith’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4555 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
were consolidated with the solicitation charge for trial.[1] ¶4 At trial, Hansen’s cellmate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30328 - 2007-09-17
were consolidated with the solicitation charge for trial.[1] ¶4 At trial, Hansen’s cellmate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30328 - 2007-09-17