Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40841 - 40850 of 83878 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 40841 - 40850 of 83878 for simple case search/1000.
State v. Brandy Albert Essex
or previously,” and claims that the sentence in this case violates § 973.15(2)(a) because it could run
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7393 - 2005-03-31
or previously,” and claims that the sentence in this case violates § 973.15(2)(a) because it could run
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7393 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137161 - 2015-03-08
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137161 - 2015-03-08
[PDF]
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Theodore F. Mazza
2002 WI 36 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 76-0476-D & 83-0843-D
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16840 - 2017-09-21
2002 WI 36 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 76-0476-D & 83-0843-D
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16840 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
against Sam’s Club. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039537 - 2025-11-18
against Sam’s Club. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039537 - 2025-11-18
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case were summarized in our decision affirming Olson’s convictions in his direct appeal: On November 28
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50106 - 2010-05-17
in this case were summarized in our decision affirming Olson’s convictions in his direct appeal: On November 28
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50106 - 2010-05-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. Bell’s claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697298 - 2023-08-30
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. Bell’s claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=697298 - 2023-08-30
State v. Robert J. Stynes
to his arraignment, Stynes requested a substitution of judge and the case was assigned to Judge Robert J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13186 - 2005-03-31
to his arraignment, Stynes requested a substitution of judge and the case was assigned to Judge Robert J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13186 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Nicholas R. Simonet
on a case-by-case basis; field sobriety tests are not always necessary to establish probable cause. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15007 - 2017-09-21
on a case-by-case basis; field sobriety tests are not always necessary to establish probable cause. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15007 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Daniel Anderson
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 96-0087-CR 96-0088
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10225 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 96-0087-CR 96-0088
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10225 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm. Background
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204230 - 2017-11-28
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm. Background
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204230 - 2017-11-28