Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40861 - 40870 of 46081 for paternity test paper work.

[PDF] Diversified Investments Corporation v. Regent Insurance Company
., 182 Wis.2d 521, 536, 514 N.W.2d 1, 6 (1994). The test is what a reasonable person in the position
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14424 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
[] test, focuses on whether government agents engaged in an ‘unauthorized physical penetration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143920 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Opheous L. Simmons
. A court applies a two-part test to determine whether an out-of-court photographic identification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8180 - 2017-09-19

Whitecaps Homes, Inc. v. Kenosha County Board of Review
by the taxpayer. The substantial evidence test is highly deferential to the board’s findings, and if any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11063 - 2005-03-31

State v. Sarah E. Johnson
] Later testing revealed Johnson’s DNA on the rubber gloves found in the outhouse. [4] Because we resolve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3583 - 2005-03-31

State v. Raphael C. Calhoun
. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] The “corner cut” field-tested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2999 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. 544, 554 (1980). The test of whether a seizure has occurred is objective and “considers whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728689 - 2023-11-16

State v. Mark W. Roob
to Roob’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim. The familiar two-pronged test for an ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4665 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
The defendant must show both elements of the test, and we need not address both prongs if the defendant fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125500 - 2014-11-03

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a two- prong test that must be met for a party to prevail on an ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70465 - 2014-09-15