Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4091 - 4100 of 63725 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 4091 - 4100 of 63725 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion for reconsideration on the sentence credit issue. Based on our review of the briefs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763333 - 2024-02-15
motion for reconsideration on the sentence credit issue. Based on our review of the briefs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763333 - 2024-02-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
enhancer. Robinson filed a motion to suppress his custodial statement to police, during which he had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640050 - 2023-04-04
enhancer. Robinson filed a motion to suppress his custodial statement to police, during which he had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640050 - 2023-04-04
[PDF]
Laura K. Waterhouse v. Thomas A. Waterhouse
custody and visitation issues, and the support modification motion was placed on hold pending resolution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18094 - 2017-09-21
custody and visitation issues, and the support modification motion was placed on hold pending resolution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18094 - 2017-09-21
State v. Richard Moder
while intoxicated and an order denying his motion for a new trial. The State presented evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2681 - 2005-03-31
while intoxicated and an order denying his motion for a new trial. The State presented evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2681 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
expired; however, the motion requires the movant to be “a prisoner in custody under sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160862 - 2017-09-21
expired; however, the motion requires the movant to be “a prisoner in custody under sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160862 - 2017-09-21
State v. Samuel V. Perez
into custody. Stewart again provided Perez with the Miranda warnings and the second interview began at 9:10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6074 - 2005-03-31
into custody. Stewart again provided Perez with the Miranda warnings and the second interview began at 9:10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6074 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The issues are: (1) the sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50287 - 2014-09-15
, and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The issues are: (1) the sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50287 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
concludes lacks arguable merit. The first of these is whether the circuit court erred in denying a motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155719 - 2017-09-21
concludes lacks arguable merit. The first of these is whether the circuit court erred in denying a motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155719 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his second WIS. STAT. § 974.06 motion. The circuit court denied the motion after it determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104775 - 2017-09-21
denying his second WIS. STAT. § 974.06 motion. The circuit court denied the motion after it determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104775 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
motion. The circuit court denied the motion after it determined that Fitzgerald’s claims were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104775 - 2013-11-25
motion. The circuit court denied the motion after it determined that Fitzgerald’s claims were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104775 - 2013-11-25