Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4091 - 4100 of 63537 for records.
Search results 4091 - 4100 of 63537 for records.
[PDF]
State v. David T.O.
he had no prior record and was receptive to future treatment. Both sides correctly state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10741 - 2017-09-20
he had no prior record and was receptive to future treatment. Both sides correctly state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10741 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
no-merit report per this court’s order.[2] After reviewing the record and counsel’s reports, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110218 - 2014-04-15
no-merit report per this court’s order.[2] After reviewing the record and counsel’s reports, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110218 - 2014-04-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 record, counsel’s report, and Myers’ response, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121953 - 2014-09-24
2 record, counsel’s report, and Myers’ response, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121953 - 2014-09-24
CA Blank Order
reviewing the record and counsel’s reports, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109564 - 2014-04-01
reviewing the record and counsel’s reports, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109564 - 2014-04-01
COURT OF APPEALS
Cynthia A. nor the guardian ad litem have filed briefs. We have, therefore, only the record on which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30796 - 2007-11-06
Cynthia A. nor the guardian ad litem have filed briefs. We have, therefore, only the record on which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30796 - 2007-11-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2023AP1741-CRNM 2 After our independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901381 - 2025-01-16
. No. 2023AP1741-CRNM 2 After our independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901381 - 2025-01-16
[PDF]
State v. James Arnold
an in camera inspection of the victim’s counseling records prior to sentencing. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6723 - 2017-09-20
an in camera inspection of the victim’s counseling records prior to sentencing. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6723 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
replaced Attorney Hinkel as the counsel of record. 2 All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916418 - 2025-02-20
replaced Attorney Hinkel as the counsel of record. 2 All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916418 - 2025-02-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not done so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529853 - 2022-06-08
not done so. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529853 - 2022-06-08
CA Blank Order
a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99690 - 2013-07-23
a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99690 - 2013-07-23