Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40901 - 40910 of 50514 for our.

State v. Robert F. Jones
the search entails. Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21 (1968). Our supreme court has held that: protective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19063 - 2005-07-18

State v. Timothy B. Wilks
Wis.2d 145, 162, 450 N.W.2d 463, 469 (Ct. App. 1989). Our review of this issue is governed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10770 - 2005-03-31

Jeanette A. Goetsch v. State of Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development
reasonable explanation for it.” We may not substitute our judgment for that of the agency as to the weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4492 - 2005-03-31

State v. Victor M. Kennedy
and she said to them "You all didn't see anything." They replied we didn't see anything its none of our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11216 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the amount of nonmetallic minerals contained in the excavated dirt sold, and its sale price. However, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333227 - 2021-02-09

[PDF] State v. Jimmy Thomas
seeks sentence modification or resentencing, our standard for reviewing the trial court's sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9767 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, too, decline to address the issue, which appears meritless based on our review of the briefs. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252215 - 2020-01-14

[PDF] State v. Gerald R. Fogle
asserts that our interpretation of the statute could lead to such absurd results as high school
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19889 - 2017-09-21

2006 WI APP 180
. § 66.0901(7). At our direction, the parties submitted supplemental briefs addressing whether Andrews
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26092 - 2006-09-26

COURT OF APPEALS
the court’s denial of his motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. However, our review of a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33503 - 2008-07-23