Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40901 - 40910 of 84001 for simple case search.

John Ryberg v. Board of Education of the School District of the Menomonie Area - 2006AP001367
to benefits because of the circuit court ruling in Chapman v. Board of Education, Eau Claire County case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28942 - 2007-05-07

[PDF] CA Blank Order
appeal. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868951 - 2024-10-29

[PDF] Village of Fontana v. Gary M. Zamecnik
the influence of intoxicants (OWI) case against him. We disagree and affirm the order of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4602 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] 22-03 - Second Letter to Interested Persons - Supplemental Comments
to SCRs 72.01(8), 72.01(9), and 72.01(10), Relating to Retention of Records in Eviction Cases Greetings
/supreme/docs/2203_supplementalinterestedpersons.pdf - 2023-10-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=947819 - 2025-04-30

COURT OF APPEALS
a prima facie case that the circuit court failed to fulfill its mandatory duties during the plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136995 - 2015-03-09

[PDF] CA Blank Order
had an open case pending in which he was charged with disorderly conduct. The State moved to join
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=746326 - 2024-01-03

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=764282 - 2024-02-21

[PDF] State v. Alvernice O. Sellers
struck because she said she might have a problem judging the case fairly because Sellers is black
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6698 - 2017-09-20

Glenn v. George Huxhold
Because we decide this case principally on procedural grounds, we need not recite the historical facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10650 - 2005-03-31