Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40931 - 40940 of 65130 for or b.
Search results 40931 - 40940 of 65130 for or b.
[PDF]
State v. Joshua N. Briggs
it was granted or entered.” Section 809.30(2)(b)2. Subsection (2)(j) further provides “[t]he defendant shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12547 - 2017-09-21
it was granted or entered.” Section 809.30(2)(b)2. Subsection (2)(j) further provides “[t]he defendant shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12547 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and, as modified, affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144767 - 2017-09-21
and, as modified, affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(1)(b)5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144767 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Luther Wade Cofield
. Thus, any error in denying access to and introduction of this evidence was harmless. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5877 - 2017-09-19
. Thus, any error in denying access to and introduction of this evidence was harmless. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5877 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Brown directly committed robbery with the threat of force, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 943.32(1)(b), he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109920 - 2017-09-21
Brown directly committed robbery with the threat of force, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 943.32(1)(b), he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109920 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
John E. Schmidt (dismissed) v. City of Kenosha
the use of restrictive zoning up to three miles from the airport boundary. See § 114.136(1)(a) & (2)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11289 - 2017-09-19
the use of restrictive zoning up to three miles from the airport boundary. See § 114.136(1)(a) & (2)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11289 - 2017-09-19
2007 WI APP 194
of law.” Id. B. Interpretation of Statutes. ¶8 This case also involves the interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29585 - 2007-08-27
of law.” Id. B. Interpretation of Statutes. ¶8 This case also involves the interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29585 - 2007-08-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
after termination. (b) The age and health of the child, both at the time of the disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353512 - 2021-04-06
after termination. (b) The age and health of the child, both at the time of the disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353512 - 2021-04-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or 938.365 containing the notice required by s. 48.356(2) or 938.356(2). (b) That at least one year has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238549 - 2019-04-04
or 938.365 containing the notice required by s. 48.356(2) or 938.356(2). (b) That at least one year has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238549 - 2019-04-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Rather, “‘[b]ecause the exercise of discretion is so essential to the [circuit] court’s functioning, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191075 - 2017-09-21
. Rather, “‘[b]ecause the exercise of discretion is so essential to the [circuit] court’s functioning, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191075 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Christopher J. Drexler
§ 343.305(8)(b)2.d, STATS. This subparagraph states that a person’s operating privileges may
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8837 - 2017-09-19
§ 343.305(8)(b)2.d, STATS. This subparagraph states that a person’s operating privileges may
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8837 - 2017-09-19