Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40971 - 40980 of 65137 for or b.
Search results 40971 - 40980 of 65137 for or b.
State v. Keith R. Randolph
of his original sentencing. As such, his contention fails. B. The sentence was not unduly harsh
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7020 - 2005-03-31
of his original sentencing. As such, his contention fails. B. The sentence was not unduly harsh
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7020 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 37
on the left half of the roadway; or (b) When overtaking and passing under circumstances in which the rules
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36600 - 2014-09-15
on the left half of the roadway; or (b) When overtaking and passing under circumstances in which the rules
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36600 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
in violation of SCR 20:1.7(a)(2). 1 24(b). By failing until August 24, 2009, to inform L.T. that her
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172383 - 2017-09-21
in violation of SCR 20:1.7(a)(2). 1 24(b). By failing until August 24, 2009, to inform L.T. that her
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172383 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to say it right now, you’re going to say it over the phone or it’s all going to be over.” “[B]ut
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90232 - 2014-09-15
to say it right now, you’re going to say it over the phone or it’s all going to be over.” “[B]ut
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90232 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 225
, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 946.49(1)(b). On January 31, 2001, Martinez was sentenced in United States
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30370 - 2014-09-15
, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 946.49(1)(b). On January 31, 2001, Martinez was sentenced in United States
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30370 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
application, we first examine and respond to the parties’ positions. B. The Parties’ Positions ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75591 - 2014-09-15
application, we first examine and respond to the parties’ positions. B. The Parties’ Positions ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75591 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 38
This charge included the penalty enhancer for use of a dangerous weapon (WIS. STAT. § 939.63(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28118 - 2014-09-15
This charge included the penalty enhancer for use of a dangerous weapon (WIS. STAT. § 939.63(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28118 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
George Dufield v. Tom McCormick
. at 590-91. Indeed, “[b]ecause the exercise of discretion is so essential to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7478 - 2017-09-20
. at 590-91. Indeed, “[b]ecause the exercise of discretion is so essential to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7478 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Rather, “‘[b]ecause the exercise of discretion is so essential to the [circuit] court’s functioning, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191075 - 2017-09-21
. Rather, “‘[b]ecause the exercise of discretion is so essential to the [circuit] court’s functioning, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191075 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Lana C. Wittig v. Brian K. Hoffart
discuss in part B below. ¶11 “Issue preclusion refers to the effect of a judgment in foreclosing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19357 - 2017-09-21
discuss in part B below. ¶11 “Issue preclusion refers to the effect of a judgment in foreclosing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19357 - 2017-09-21