Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40971 - 40980 of 63904 for records.

Cadott Education Association v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
that is not supported by substantial evidence in the record. Section 227.57(6), Stats. "Substantial evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8753 - 2005-03-31

State v. Gary L. Parson
relationship. Parson contends that there was no evidence in the record that they knew each other or shared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11953 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Clearpointe Capital, Inc. v. Rickey Townsend
, 346 n.2, 302 N.W.2d 508 (Ct. App. 1981), we have been unable to locate any place in the record where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6552 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
brought to the [trial judge’s] attention off the record.” After determining that the trial judge did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39848 - 2009-08-24

[PDF] Gary Regge v. Sunset Memory Gardens
of the affidavit is contained in the appendix to the Regges’ appellate brief, but is not part of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12170 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Shelby L.K. v. Steven O.
. 9. There are no tax records for 1989, and [Steven O.] claims to have made about the same ($1,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12194 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] The Estate of Martha Burgess v. Carl Peterson
decision on the reimbursement issue. In May of 1995, Edna stipulated on the record that all legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10853 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Frontsheet
, Dr. Collins reviewed the criminal complaint, Anderson's medical records, and a summary of his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=664284 - 2023-06-02

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of these submissions and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112057 - 2017-09-21

Jami L. Van Boxtel v. Brent F. Van Boxtel
the property division." The record contains no ruling on the petitioner's motion and the matter was left
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17480 - 2005-03-31