Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40991 - 41000 of 68502 for did.

County of Dane v. Gary M. Sam
, did not constitute multiple punishments, and did not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11255 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. John Casteel
of unlawful firearm possession. Casteel did not file a timely appeal from the trial court order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14221 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Julian D. Pope
the destruction of evidence. Pope takes this appeal from the trial court’s ruling that the police entry did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14925 - 2017-09-21

State v. Michael Alan Williams
. The circuit court again denied the motion, and this time Williams did not appeal. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18076 - 2005-05-09

[PDF] NOTICE
sentence. Baldwin did not appeal from either judgment, contending that he was never advised of his right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28987 - 2014-09-15

Karl Melnik v. Matthew Mikolic
described the property as a 120 acre parcel, as did the Wisconsin Real Estate Transfer Return. Mikolic’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6908 - 2005-03-31

Racine County Human Services Department v. Olivia G.
court did not find Ridgewood to be the least restrictive setting—that a facility similar to one located
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6546 - 2005-03-31

Wisconsin Mortgage Assurance Corporation v. Columbus Federal Savings Bank
obtained any relief. WMAC did not file a claim in this proceeding until July 1993. The liquidator
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12998 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Walter E. Cline
, counsel tried once to call the Texas prosecutor in Cline's case, but could not reach him. Counsel did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9848 - 2017-09-19

State v. Nathaniel Harris
be burdensome upon the jail to manage. Although the court did not explicitly consider the sentencing factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13182 - 2005-03-31