Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 411 - 420 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.

COURT OF APPEALS
. Ellenbecker and Redmann were granted joint legal custody of K.O.E. and equal physical placement. Ellenbecker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124615 - 2014-10-20

[PDF] State v. Regies Mundy
denying his motion for sentence credit under § 973.155, STATS. Because Mundy was sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7882 - 2017-09-19

State v. Regies Mundy
appeals from an order denying his motion for sentence credit under § 973.155, Stats. Because Mundy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7882 - 2005-03-31

[MS WORD] FA-4176V: Decision and Order for Contempt
Petitioner/Joint Petitioner A: Respondent/Joint Petitioner B: Petitioner/Joint
/formdisplay/FA-4176V.doc?formNumber=FA-4176V&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-06-13

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. No. 2014AP1935 2 Mark and Sarah Zeman were divorced in 2005, and agreed to joint legal custody
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155858 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
Streicher’s motion to suppress statements Streicher gave at the West Bend police department before and after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140999 - 2015-05-05

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
as a consequence. The circuit court denied Streicher’s motion to suppress statements Streicher gave at the West
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140999 - 2017-09-21

Lorraine K. Kerbell (now Ruth) v. Robert A. Kerbell
were divorced after an eleven-year marriage. They share joint custody of their daughter, who was born
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11453 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Lorraine K. Kerbell (now Ruth) v. Robert A. Kerbell
not seek sole custody or primary physical placement. As the basis for the motion, Kerbell states that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11453 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Scott M.H. v. Kathleen M.H.
were divorced on March 23, 1993. The parties were awarded joint legal custody of their only child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12243 - 2017-09-21