Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 411 - 420 of 9116 for divorce.

COURT OF APPEALS
denying in part his motion to reconsider the property division in a judgment of divorce.[1] He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95341 - 2013-04-10

[PDF] The Estate of Ann M. Ernst v. Dennis John Ernst
preclusion prevents Dennis from asserting sole ownership when he asserted otherwise in an Arizona divorce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12976 - 2017-09-21

Elyse Joransen-Hamilton Knutson v. Richard C. Knutson
appeals from that portion of a divorce judgment enforcing a premarital agreement that precluded her from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2790 - 2005-03-31

As Case Counts
813 356379 Civil Divorce 731 354 5883 6099 746 938 609 477 15837 Other Family 7725 812 668 363 33
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/agedispo.xlsx - 2026-04-16

Ronald W. Monette v. Corinne Monette
. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. In this post-divorce proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3853 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Ronald W. Monette v. Corinne Monette
. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. In this post-divorce proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3853 - 2017-09-20

Kimberly Kay Arneson v. Robert Eric Arneson
as exemption) after the circuit court clarified this aspect of a previous judgment of divorce. Because we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12955 - 2005-03-31

Roger R. Bjork v. Carol Bjork
., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Carol Bjork appeals that part of the divorce judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15603 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Roger R. Bjork v. Carol Bjork
that part of the divorce judgment dividing the parties’ property. She argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15603 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Kimberly Kay Arneson v. Robert Eric Arneson
the circuit court clarified this aspect NO. 97-2509-FT 2 of a previous judgment of divorce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12955 - 2017-09-21