Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 411 - 420 of 68942 for j o e y.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for Milwaukee County: KEVIN E. MARTENS and RICHARD J. SANKOVITZ, Judges. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95179 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
, ¶9. ¶7 Two kinds of DNA profiling were done in this case, STR and Y-STR.[2] Each profile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113225 - 2014-06-03

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in this case, STR and Y- STR. 2 Each profile generated a separate analysis and report. The STR profile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113225 - 2017-09-21

State v. James O. Edwards
was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and Jeffrey J. Kassel, assistant attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3684 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Timothy R. Stankus
JUDGES: Snyder, P.J., Brown and Anderson, JJ. Concurred: Anderson, J. Dissented: Appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12782 - 2017-09-21

State v. Timothy R. Stankus
: Anderson, J. Dissented: Appellant ATTORNEYS: On behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12782 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] AP001022 CR State v. Robert E. Poch, Jr.
2019AP001022 CR State v. Robert E. Poch, Jr. 2022AP000478 CR State v. Brandon Joseph Teasdale
/ca/unpub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910192 - 2025-01-30

[PDF] NOTICE
IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I CARL E. RUCKER AND RUCKER DETECTIVE AGENCY, PETITIONERS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33300 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Charles J. Hajicek
of Case: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, v. Charles J. Hajicek
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17462 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
system[.]” The State continued, “[s]o we know that this child had three different types of synthetic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247603 - 2019-10-01