Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 411 - 420 of 41447 for she.
Search results 411 - 420 of 41447 for she.
State v. Patricia LaBelle
not occur while she was in custody, because the evidence not produced by the State was not exculpatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13704 - 2005-03-31
not occur while she was in custody, because the evidence not produced by the State was not exculpatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13704 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
rights to her son, Everett.2 On appeal, she argues that the circuit court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611577 - 2023-01-18
rights to her son, Everett.2 On appeal, she argues that the circuit court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611577 - 2023-01-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
argues that the arresting officer improperly informed the accused, and that she did not refuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28665 - 2014-09-15
argues that the arresting officer improperly informed the accused, and that she did not refuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28665 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Patricia LaBelle
. Because LaBelle’s inculpatory statement did not occur while she was in custody, because the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13704 - 2014-09-15
. Because LaBelle’s inculpatory statement did not occur while she was in custody, because the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13704 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 11, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of App...
, and that she did not refuse to submit to testing under § 343.305. We affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28665 - 2007-04-10
, and that she did not refuse to submit to testing under § 343.305. We affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28665 - 2007-04-10
COURT OF APPEALS
or more, third offense, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a) and (b). She contends the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34113 - 2008-09-24
or more, third offense, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a) and (b). She contends the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34113 - 2008-09-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
commitment and the involuntary administration of medication and treatment.3 She
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=606198 - 2022-12-29
commitment and the involuntary administration of medication and treatment.3 She
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=606198 - 2022-12-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
entered into evidence. ¶3 Andrews testified that she had been Lisa’s case manager for “[a]bout
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301349 - 2020-11-04
entered into evidence. ¶3 Andrews testified that she had been Lisa’s case manager for “[a]bout
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301349 - 2020-11-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
homicide, and an order denying her motion for postconviction relief. She contends that: (1) her plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71552 - 2014-09-15
homicide, and an order denying her motion for postconviction relief. She contends that: (1) her plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71552 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
., she and Becerra had been in a romantic relationship for approximately twelve years that resulted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45899 - 2014-09-15
., she and Becerra had been in a romantic relationship for approximately twelve years that resulted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45899 - 2014-09-15