Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41001 - 41010 of 68517 for did.
Search results 41001 - 41010 of 68517 for did.
State v. Charles A. Toal
suspension of his operating privileges, did not constitute multiple punishments, and did not violate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11084 - 2005-03-31
suspension of his operating privileges, did not constitute multiple punishments, and did not violate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11084 - 2005-03-31
State v. Antonio Herrera, Jr.
did or said anything to assist or encourage Foote in the commission of the crime, Herrera’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3644 - 2005-03-31
did or said anything to assist or encourage Foote in the commission of the crime, Herrera’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3644 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jorel T. Norwood
of proving intent. Norwood’s defense was that he did not intentionally spit at anybody, but rather spit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25452 - 2006-06-07
of proving intent. Norwood’s defense was that he did not intentionally spit at anybody, but rather spit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25452 - 2006-06-07
Garry A. Borzych v. Daniel Bertrand
charge, but concluded that the entire conduct report should be vacated because the record did not support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20742 - 2005-12-21
charge, but concluded that the entire conduct report should be vacated because the record did not support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20742 - 2005-12-21
[PDF]
State v. Daniel L. Litsey
intercourse with him almost every day. A.F. did not testify that Litsey threatened to use force or violence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11957 - 2017-09-21
intercourse with him almost every day. A.F. did not testify that Litsey threatened to use force or violence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11957 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
his request and provided what it indicated was the entire file. In his petition, Pressley did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181458 - 2017-09-21
his request and provided what it indicated was the entire file. In his petition, Pressley did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181458 - 2017-09-21
State v. Colin N. Gelford
are raised for the first time on appeal. He did not object to consideration of his membership in NAMBLA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11613 - 2005-03-31
are raised for the first time on appeal. He did not object to consideration of his membership in NAMBLA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11613 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Brian Brannon
discretion. Because we conclude that it did not, we affirm. NO. 96-0572-CR 2 Brannon pled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10443 - 2017-09-20
discretion. Because we conclude that it did not, we affirm. NO. 96-0572-CR 2 Brannon pled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10443 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. LaPonzo Monroe Dallas
motions. Because this transcript did not affect either the decision of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19523 - 2017-09-21
motions. Because this transcript did not affect either the decision of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19523 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, to run concurrent to the previously imposed three-year sentence. Baldwin did not appeal from either
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28987 - 2007-06-26
, to run concurrent to the previously imposed three-year sentence. Baldwin did not appeal from either
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28987 - 2007-06-26