Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41001 - 41010 of 57351 for id.
Search results 41001 - 41010 of 57351 for id.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
accepting a plea other than not guilty. See id., ¶18; see also WIS. STAT. § 971.08. The record—including
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=803639 - 2024-05-21
accepting a plea other than not guilty. See id., ¶18; see also WIS. STAT. § 971.08. The record—including
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=803639 - 2024-05-21
[PDF]
Joe M. Janz v. Wisconsin State Labor and Industry Review Commission
if they are supported by substantial evidence.” Id. “The agency’s decision may be set aside by a reviewing court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20423 - 2017-09-21
if they are supported by substantial evidence.” Id. “The agency’s decision may be set aside by a reviewing court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20423 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Viola G. Bodach v. Village of Fontana-On-Geneva Lake
will not overturn the trial court’s findings unless they are clearly erroneous. See id. The trial court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11480 - 2017-09-19
will not overturn the trial court’s findings unless they are clearly erroneous. See id. The trial court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11480 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth C. Luedke
, which grant the defendant the right to discovery pursuant to ch. 804. Id. The case holds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10706 - 2017-09-20
, which grant the defendant the right to discovery pursuant to ch. 804. Id. The case holds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10706 - 2017-09-20
State v. Margaret C.
procedure.” Id. at 863, 537 N.W.2d at 50 (emphasis added). As Margaret concedes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14792 - 2005-03-31
procedure.” Id. at 863, 537 N.W.2d at 50 (emphasis added). As Margaret concedes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14792 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Id. ¶15 The circuit court concluded at the plea hearing that the State had “strong evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141768 - 2015-05-19
.” Id. ¶15 The circuit court concluded at the plea hearing that the State had “strong evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141768 - 2015-05-19
City of Milwaukee v. B. Davis Investment, LLC
, however, “owe[s] no deference to the trial court’s resolution of issues of law.” Id. at 360. Further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5174 - 2005-03-31
, however, “owe[s] no deference to the trial court’s resolution of issues of law.” Id. at 360. Further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5174 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lionel C. Whitehead
an objective standard of reasonableness. Id. To establish prejudice, Whitehead must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7487 - 2005-03-31
an objective standard of reasonableness. Id. To establish prejudice, Whitehead must show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7487 - 2005-03-31
Eller Media, Inc v. State of Wisconsin Division of Hearings and Appeals
nor attempt to regulate or protect an economic interest. See id. at 508-09. Similarly, in MCI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3434 - 2005-03-31
nor attempt to regulate or protect an economic interest. See id. at 508-09. Similarly, in MCI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3434 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the erroneous exercise of discretion standard, id., ¶28, that is, whether the court relied on the relevant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=705569 - 2023-09-21
the erroneous exercise of discretion standard, id., ¶28, that is, whether the court relied on the relevant
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=705569 - 2023-09-21