Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41011 - 41020 of 83277 for case search.
Search results 41011 - 41020 of 83277 for case search.
State v. Tecia D.B.
visitation. ¶4 Dawn Richardson, the social worker assigned to Tecia’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6836 - 2005-03-31
visitation. ¶4 Dawn Richardson, the social worker assigned to Tecia’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6836 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to order restitution in this case but remand for further proceedings as to the amount—it is unclear from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90981 - 2013-01-02
to order restitution in this case but remand for further proceedings as to the amount—it is unclear from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90981 - 2013-01-02
2010 WI APP 59
2010 WI App 59 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2009AP1008 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47972 - 2010-04-25
2010 WI App 59 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2009AP1008 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47972 - 2010-04-25
[PDF]
State v. Darrell C. Solfest
, the issue presented by this case is one of statutory construction. As such, a de novo standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12201 - 2017-09-21
, the issue presented by this case is one of statutory construction. As such, a de novo standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12201 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
case. Lozano contends that the circuit court’s factual findings as to negligence were clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95625 - 2013-04-17
case. Lozano contends that the circuit court’s factual findings as to negligence were clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95625 - 2013-04-17
[PDF]
State v. Wayne A. Sutton
the appeal in this case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court for its review and determination. ISSUE Whether
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21484 - 2017-09-21
the appeal in this case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court for its review and determination. ISSUE Whether
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21484 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Waukesha County v. Ty L.
the authority to waive his physical presence at the hearing. In a case where the GAL waived contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13389 - 2017-09-21
the authority to waive his physical presence at the hearing. In a case where the GAL waived contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13389 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. McCoy was already released on a signature bond on this case, but he remained in custody on other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34993 - 2014-09-15
. McCoy was already released on a signature bond on this case, but he remained in custody on other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34993 - 2014-09-15
WI App 139 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 2012AP236-CR 2012AP237-CR ...
2012 WI App 139 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 2012AP236-CR 2012AP237
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89425 - 2012-12-18
2012 WI App 139 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 2012AP236-CR 2012AP237
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89425 - 2012-12-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, at which it received testimony from D.F.’s case manager since 2021, who the court found “very, very
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1075422 - 2026-02-06
, at which it received testimony from D.F.’s case manager since 2021, who the court found “very, very
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1075422 - 2026-02-06