Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41021 - 41030 of 59355 for SMALL CLAIMS.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
report next addresses whether there is arguable merit to J.H.’s claim that it was unconstitutional
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=869605 - 2024-10-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 28, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
), 939.63, 943.10(2)(a) and 939.05 (2003-04).[1] Boose claims the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27239 - 2006-11-27

County of Dunn v. Laurence E. Eccles
to him. Eccles claims that because of his dyslexia, he was confused and unable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13041 - 2005-03-31

City of West Allis v. C. Scott Radtke
claims, arguing that the police officer's failure to read him the entire “Informing the Accused” form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9757 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
indicated to the court that he understood the information explained on that form, and is not now claiming
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144577 - 2015-07-30

CA Blank Order
employability, strong family, and claimed concern for his children. Although the fifteen-year sentence imposed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131671 - 2014-12-16

State v. Jose R.
The trial court also did not address specifically Jose R.’s claim that he asked to call his mother
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19172 - 2005-08-01

State v. Stanley H. Graewin
of possession of an untagged deer, and an order denying his postconviction motion for relief. He claims he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15734 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a settlement agreement. Trial was to the court on the McMasters’ remaining claim, that Wilmot has a conflict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189106 - 2017-09-21

State v. Abraham H. Salazar
. Salazar claims that his sentence is unduly harsh because the court imposed the presumptive minimum three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10171 - 2005-03-31