Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41021 - 41030 of 68532 for did.
Search results 41021 - 41030 of 68532 for did.
Penny L. Clauer v. Lafayette County
for sanctions against the County under § 814.025, Stats. WWLS did not pursue the sanctions issue any further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13954 - 2005-03-31
for sanctions against the County under § 814.025, Stats. WWLS did not pursue the sanctions issue any further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13954 - 2005-03-31
Robert Louis Halbleib v. Eileen Mary Halbleib
Wis. 2d 496, 664 N.W.2d 641. Eileen’s reliance on Sulzer is misplaced. Sulzer did not hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6580 - 2005-03-31
Wis. 2d 496, 664 N.W.2d 641. Eileen’s reliance on Sulzer is misplaced. Sulzer did not hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6580 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Roger A. Jerome
that this evidence was admissible under WIS. STAT. § 904.04(2),1 we affirm the judgment. ¶2 The trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15986 - 2017-09-21
that this evidence was admissible under WIS. STAT. § 904.04(2),1 we affirm the judgment. ¶2 The trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15986 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Sharon McBride
and McBride's nephew. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in excluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9102 - 2017-09-19
and McBride's nephew. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in excluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9102 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
that the alleged new factor did not justify sentence modification. Accordingly, we are satisfied that the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91633 - 2013-01-15
that the alleged new factor did not justify sentence modification. Accordingly, we are satisfied that the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91633 - 2013-01-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. § 939.05. As the circuit court explained when it denied the postconviction motion: “[T]he State did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=600028 - 2022-12-13
. § 939.05. As the circuit court explained when it denied the postconviction motion: “[T]he State did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=600028 - 2022-12-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as a condition of probation. Ellis did not appeal or file any postconviction motions. ¶3 Nearly twenty years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70281 - 2014-09-15
as a condition of probation. Ellis did not appeal or file any postconviction motions. ¶3 Nearly twenty years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70281 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Kimy E. Trotter
of the residence to be searched. Trotter did not, however, raise these arguments with specificity until after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13202 - 2017-09-21
of the residence to be searched. Trotter did not, however, raise these arguments with specificity until after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13202 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Billy Daniel Evans
of the incident. We are satisfied, however, that the stipulation did not remove any elements of the offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16276 - 2017-09-21
of the incident. We are satisfied, however, that the stipulation did not remove any elements of the offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16276 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. Rennhack did not respond. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027898 - 2025-10-28
a response. Rennhack did not respond. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027898 - 2025-10-28