Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41021 - 41030 of 68544 for did.

COURT OF APPEALS
of sexual assault. He contends the victim did not testify to the exact number of times she had sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34249 - 2008-10-08

[PDF] Joseph T. Eells v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
, suffered post-traumatic stress disorder after witnessing a suicide. LIRC concluded that this incident did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8613 - 2017-09-19

County of Iowa v. Leon T. Klinger
, as he does on appeal, that he did not validly and voluntarily consent to the taking of a sample of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5047 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
not to appraise lot three. In his deposition, Gene testified to having a conversation with Baratka, but he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147653 - 2015-08-30

Penny L. Clauer v. Lafayette County
for sanctions against the County under § 814.025, Stats. WWLS did not pursue the sanctions issue any further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13954 - 2005-03-31

Robert Louis Halbleib v. Eileen Mary Halbleib
Wis. 2d 496, 664 N.W.2d 641. Eileen’s reliance on Sulzer is misplaced. Sulzer did not hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6580 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Roger A. Jerome
that this evidence was admissible under WIS. STAT. § 904.04(2),1 we affirm the judgment. ¶2 The trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15986 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Sharon McBride
and McBride's nephew. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in excluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9102 - 2017-09-19

CA Blank Order
that the alleged new factor did not justify sentence modification. Accordingly, we are satisfied that the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91633 - 2013-01-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. § 939.05. As the circuit court explained when it denied the postconviction motion: “[T]he State did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=600028 - 2022-12-13