Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41021 - 41030 of 64077 for records/1000.
Search results 41021 - 41030 of 64077 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, the no-merit report, and Jensen’s response, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170580 - 2017-09-21
. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, the no-merit report, and Jensen’s response, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170580 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2024AP704-CRNM 2 On this court’s review of the no-merit report, response, and the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027649 - 2025-10-23
. No. 2024AP704-CRNM 2 On this court’s review of the no-merit report, response, and the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027649 - 2025-10-23
February 1, 2000
of Records) 02/24/2010 09-10 In the Matter of Amending the Rules of Judicial Conduct 10/28/2009 09-11
/sc/pendscr/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51617 - 2010-06-29
of Records) 02/24/2010 09-10 In the Matter of Amending the Rules of Judicial Conduct 10/28/2009 09-11
/sc/pendscr/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51617 - 2010-06-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an order denying his postconviction motion for plea withdrawal. After reviewing the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170111 - 2017-09-21
and an order denying his postconviction motion for plea withdrawal. After reviewing the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170111 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2024AP704-CRNM 2 On this court’s review of the no-merit report, response, and the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027649 - 2025-10-23
. No. 2024AP704-CRNM 2 On this court’s review of the no-merit report, response, and the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027649 - 2025-10-23
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey C. Gilman
. Based on this record, we conclude that Gilman waived any objection to the State’s sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12900 - 2017-09-21
. Based on this record, we conclude that Gilman waived any objection to the State’s sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12900 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Orzell P. Grinnage
for raising the issues of ineffective assistance of postconviction and appellate counsel. The record
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14261 - 2014-09-15
for raising the issues of ineffective assistance of postconviction and appellate counsel. The record
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14261 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
of the record, identified a potential issue of arguable merit relating to the imposition of a DNA surcharge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97317 - 2013-05-21
of the record, identified a potential issue of arguable merit relating to the imposition of a DNA surcharge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97317 - 2013-05-21
COURT OF APPEALS
on the record a proper exercise of discretion when imposing a DNA surcharge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 973.046(1g
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64047 - 2011-05-16
on the record a proper exercise of discretion when imposing a DNA surcharge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 973.046(1g
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64047 - 2011-05-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
considering the arguments of the parties on appeal, the transcript of the agency hearing and the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139064 - 2017-09-21
considering the arguments of the parties on appeal, the transcript of the agency hearing and the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139064 - 2017-09-21