Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41031 - 41040 of 59018 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 41031 - 41040 of 59018 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Brown County v. Rochelle D.
to dismiss two of the three petition grounds that did not have a factual basis. Consequently, he claims he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3425 - 2005-03-31
to dismiss two of the three petition grounds that did not have a factual basis. Consequently, he claims he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3425 - 2005-03-31
Brown County v. Rochelle D.
to dismiss two of the three petition grounds that did not have a factual basis. Consequently, he claims he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3426 - 2005-03-31
to dismiss two of the three petition grounds that did not have a factual basis. Consequently, he claims he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3426 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
time limits Appellate counsel does not discuss whether Sherry K. could mount a meritorious claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100642 - 2017-09-21
time limits Appellate counsel does not discuss whether Sherry K. could mount a meritorious claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100642 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
failure to make an appropriate legal argument about the subpoena. Alternatively, Wilson claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170947 - 2017-09-21
failure to make an appropriate legal argument about the subpoena. Alternatively, Wilson claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170947 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Donald Savinski v. Karren Kimble
rationale for the exempting statute. Id. 3 In this case, Kimble claimed there was a statutory exception
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13278 - 2017-09-21
rationale for the exempting statute. Id. 3 In this case, Kimble claimed there was a statutory exception
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13278 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 42
or revocation. (4m) The petitioner has made restitution to or settled all claims of persons injured or harmed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65891 - 2014-09-15
or revocation. (4m) The petitioner has made restitution to or settled all claims of persons injured or harmed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65891 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. William S. Cherry
alleged claims of error under WIS. STAT. § 901.03(4) (1999-2000) for “plain error.” “Plain error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4389 - 2017-09-19
alleged claims of error under WIS. STAT. § 901.03(4) (1999-2000) for “plain error.” “Plain error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4389 - 2017-09-19
State v. Richard Austin
principles to Austin’s claims. Wisconsin Stat. § 343.305(9) Refusal Hearing ¶11 State v. Nordness, 128
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7269 - 2005-03-31
principles to Austin’s claims. Wisconsin Stat. § 343.305(9) Refusal Hearing ¶11 State v. Nordness, 128
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7269 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for summary judgment, arguing, as relevant here, that Rice’s claims should be dismissed because the program
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984590 - 2025-07-17
for summary judgment, arguing, as relevant here, that Rice’s claims should be dismissed because the program
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984590 - 2025-07-17
COURT OF APPEALS
introduced Reynolds’ statement that he claimed to have met Bolden in June of 2004, without mentioning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36413 - 2009-05-06
introduced Reynolds’ statement that he claimed to have met Bolden in June of 2004, without mentioning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36413 - 2009-05-06