Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41031 - 41040 of 58509 for speedy trial.

[PDF] State v. Jack D. Thomas
of the counts for hunting were multiplicitous and moved to dismiss them. The trial court agreed the charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11434 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Kathryn R. Fleming v. Dean P. Fleming
the presumption. We disagree. A trial court is not precluded from finding self-serving and after-the-fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26592 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
as not ripe, and the matter proceeded to a bench trial. ¶5 At trial, the Town presented expert testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215861 - 2018-07-25

[PDF] Louis Salimes v. Town of Caledonia Board of Police and Fire Commissioners
that the Commission failed and the trial court erred in the application of the just cause standards found in § 62.13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9461 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. No. 2013AP2071 3 required counsel to prepare for trial on numerous undisputed issues and more than
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112616 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of her husband, Roland Krueger. At trial, Sarah Johnson testified that she knew Krueger and Roland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143666 - 2017-09-21

Louis Salimes v. Town of Caledonia Board of Police and Fire Commissioners
that the Commission failed and the trial court erred in the application of the just cause standards found in § 62.13(5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9461 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
erred in determining that Rhodes was competent to stand trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262806 - 2020-06-02

[PDF] Michael S. MacLeish v. Peter R. Kleinschmidt
. On appeal, the 2005AP641 2 Kleinschmidts challenge evidentiary rulings at trial. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24550 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Town of Jackson v. James A. O'Hearn
conclude that the evidence supports the trial court’s finding that the meat shop violated the zoning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13556 - 2017-09-21