Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41031 - 41040 of 58245 for speedy trial.

[PDF] SC Table of Pending Cases - added the recently accepted cases 2009AP2099, 2009AP2752 and 2010AP784
)(b) at trial. 02/08/2011 REVW Oral Arg 09/06/2011 2 Kenosha 11/17/2010 Pub 2010 WI
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71282 - 2014-09-15

Sinora Glenn v. Michael T. Plante, M.D.
, and Edward E. Robinson and Cannon & Dunphy, S.C., Brookfield, on behalf of the Wisconsin Academy of Trial
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16630 - 2005-03-31

Christopher King v. Sonia G. King
. 12, 1996 at 2. ¶7 The three-day trial began on June 11, 1996. The circuit court, Judge
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17242 - 2005-03-31

State v. Thomas H. Bush
¶4 The following facts are undisputed and were stipulated to by the parties at trial: Mr. Bush
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18883 - 2005-07-05

COURT OF APPEALS
that follow are taken from the testimony presented and the exhibits entered into evidence at trial. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115434 - 2014-06-25

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
incriminating text messages between Cindy and Rausch, some of which were introduced at trial. ¶4 Rausch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=517577 - 2022-05-11

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
conditions on their property that qualified (continued) No. 2021AP1592 5 ¶8 A trial commenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=561302 - 2022-09-02

[PDF] Christopher King v. Sonia G. King
The three-day trial began on June 11, 1996. The circuit court, Judge Patrick C. Haughney presiding
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17242 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of second-degree sexual assault and false No. 2021AP1156-CR 2 imprisonment. Before trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=593478 - 2022-11-23

State v. William Carpenter
. Accordingly, we reverse the trial courts' orders determining that ch. 980 is unconstitutional on these grounds
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16927 - 2005-03-31